Wildfires and the Dissemination of Information in Oregon

Authors

  • Bruce Wardlow
  • Alice Perez

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5860/dttp.v49i3/4.7691

Abstract

Wildfires have the reputation for being fast and unpredictable, government documents tend to be the opposite. So, what happens when the two meet? The 2020 Oregon wildfire season was one of the most destructive in the state’s history. We examined the 2020 Oregon wildfires and relief, specifically the Mount Hood fires and witnessed how the world of government publications responded. Wildfires are also very labor-intensive natural disasters to manage in a normal year, and 2020 was even worse. Due to labor constraints of the pandemic, the Oregon 2020 wildfire season was particularly bad. A wide array of federal government organizations quickly got involved, ranging from the IRS to the USDA, as well as state and local agencies. We also learned some specific senators and representatives were quick to respond, although the House and the Senate, as well as the president, were much slower to respond. This is the story of a collection of four distinct fires just outside of Portland, Oregon, that grew to become one large fire control effort, and the governmental responses to this natural disaster. The four wildfires in Oregon we will focus on are the Riverside Fire, Beachie Creek Fire, Lionshead Fire, and P515 Fire.

Author Biography

Bruce Wardlow

Bruce Wardlow (wardlowb@uw.edu) and Alice Perez Ververa (alicpere@uw.edu) are students at University of Washington Information School. This paper was written for LIS 526 Government Publications, Fall 2020, Professor Cassandra Hartnett.

Downloads

Published

2021-11-17

Issue

Section

Student Features