Employing Usage Data to Plan for an E-book Collection
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5860/lrts.56n4.254Abstract
The authors created a research method to identify local users’ needs and explored how well currently available e-book content might meet those needs. Using circulation records, interlibrary loan (ILL) requests, and in-house use as a gauge of patron demand during a three-year period, the study compared these records to e-book offerings from the major aggregators. The resulting data were analyzed by subject and publication date. The authors found that e-book content that might meet users’ needs was not uniformly distributed across disciplines and that more recent publications were more likely to have e-book equivalents. The highest percentage of e-book equivalents was for titles requested via ILL, suggesting that this might be the best place to begin e-book collecting. The results suggest that e-books may meet only a fraction of the demand for monographic scholarly output and that libraries cannot yet rely on e-book content to entirely supplant print, although e-book coverage is growing dramatically.
References
Lynn Silipigni Connaway, Heather L Wicht, '“What Happened to the E-Book Revolution? The Gradual Integration of E-Books into Academic Libraries, ”' Journal of Electronic Publishing 10 no. 3 (2007): dx.doi.org.ezp2.lib.umn.edu/10.3998/3336451.0010.302 (accessed Mar. 25, 2012).nLucia Snowhill, '“E-Books and Their Future in Academic Libraries, ”' D-Lib Magazine 7 no. 7/8 (2001): (accessed Sept. 2, 2011).www.dlib.org/dlib/july01/snowhill/07snowhill.htmlnJustin Littman, Lynn Silipigni Connaway, '“A Circulation Analysis of Print Books and E-Books in an Academic Research Library, ”' Library Resources & Technical Services 48 no. 4 (2004): 256-62nDracine Hodges, Cyndi Preston, Marsha J Hamilton, '“Patron-Initiated Collection Development: Progress of a Paradigm Shift, ”' Collection Management 35 no. 3/4 (2010): 211nMillie L Jackson, Beth Holley, '“The Evolving Role of E-Books at the University of Alabama Libraries, ”' Serials Librarian 61 no. 2 (2011): 200-206nHodges, Preston, and Hamilton, “Patron-Initiated Collection Development, ” 209.n Jackson, and Holley, “The Evolving Role of E-Books, ” 202; Nixon, and Saunders, “A Study of Circulation Statistics”nJim Stemper, Susan Barribeau, '“Perpetual Access to Electronic Journals: A Survey of One Academic Research Library’s Licenses, ”' Library Resources & Technical Services 50 no. 2 (2006): 91-108nLindsey Schell, Sue Polanka Ed., '“The Academic Library E-Book, ” in
No Shelf Required: E-Books in Libraries
' (Chicago: ALA 2011) 75-93nSnowhill, “E-Books.”nIbid.nCarol A Mandel, Mary C Summerfield, Paul Kantor, 'Online Books at Columbia: Measurement and Early Results on Use, Satisfaction, and Effect' (Washington, D.C.: Association of Research Libraries 1997) (accessed Feb. 19, 2012).nAllen McKiel, '“ebrary’s Global eBook Survey: Survey Analysis, ”' June 11, 2007, site.ebrarycom/lib/librarycenter/docDetail.action?docID=80000723nConnaway, and Wicht, “What Happened to the E-Book Revolution?”nWendy Allen Shelburne, '“E-Book Usage in an Academic Library: User Attitudes and Behaviors, ”' Library Collections, Acquisitions & Technical Services 33 no. 2/3 (2009): 59-72nNancy Sprague, Ben Hunter, '“Assessing E-Books: Taking a Closer Look at E-Book Statistics, ”' Library Collections, Acquisitions & Technical Services 32 no. 3/4 (2009): 150-57nLittman, and Connaway, “A Circulation Analysis, ” 256.nRusty Kimball, Gary Ives, Kathy Jackson, '“Comparative Usage of Science E-Book and Print Collections at Texas A&M University Libraries, ”' Collection Management 35 no. 1 (2010): 15-28nIbid., 15.nMartha Kyrillidou, Shaneka Morris, 'ARL Statistics, 2008–2009' (Washington, D.C.: Association of Research Libraries 2011)nJudith M Nixon, Robert S Freeman, Suzanne M Ward, '“Patron-Driven Acquisitions: An Introduction and Literature Review, ”' Collection Management 35 no. 3/4 (2010): 119nNixon, and Saunders, “A Study of Circulation Statistics.”nTyler, '“Effective Selectors?”'nGayle Rosemary, Y C Chan, '“Purchase Instead of Borrow: An International Perspective, ”' Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Information Supply 14 no. 4 (2004): 23-37nTyler, '“Effective Selectors?”' ():nUta Hussong-Christian, Kerri Goergen-Doll, '“We’re Listening: Using Patron Feedback to Assess and Enhance Purchase on Demand, ”' Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Electronic Reserve 20 no. 2 (2010): 319-35nTyler, '“Effective Selectors?”' ():nNixon, Freeman, and Ward, “Patron-Driven Acquisitions, ” 121.nWay, “The Assessment of Patron-Initiated Collection Development”; Kyrillidou, and Morris,
ARL Statistics, 2008–2009
;nHodges, Preston, Hamilton, '“Patron-Initiated Collection Development”'nPrice, McDonald, '“Beguiled by Bananas.”' ():nJason Price, John McDonald, '“To Supersede or Supplement: Profiling E-Book Aggregator Collections vs. Our Print Collections”' (Charleston, S.C.: presentation, Charleston Conference Nov. 7, 2007) (accessed Apr. 20, 2012).nSarah Pomerantz, '“The Availability of E-Books: Examples of Nursing and Business, ”' Collection Building 29 no. 1 (2010): 11-14nF W Lancaster, The Measurement and Evaluation of Library Services (Washington, D.C.: Information Resources Press 1977 )nWay, “The Assessment of Patron-Initiated Collection Development.”n
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC-BY-NC 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) after it has been accepted for publication. Sharing can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
