Can Blogging Help Cataloging?

Authors

  • Sherab Chen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5860/lrts.53n4.251

Abstract

In response to the ongoing conversation about Library 2.0, which has focused on user participation and emphasizes efficiency in delivering library services to users, this paper draws attention to a practical application in technical services: using Web 2.0 tools to enhance performance in the cataloging department. From his position as the coordinator for non-Roman cataloging in a large academic library, the author shares his experience using a blog and other Web 2.0 tools to improve section management and professional activities.

References

Tim O’Reilly, '“What Is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software,”' () online posting, Sept. 30, 2005, O’Reilly Media, nPaul Miller, '“Web 2.0: Building the New Library,”' Ariadne 45 (Oct. 2005): (accessed Apr. 16, 2009)www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue45/millernIbidnMichael E. Casey, Laura C. Savastinuk, '“Library 2.0: Service for the Next-Generation Library,”' Library Journal.com (Sept. 1, 2006): (accessed Feb. 3, 2009)www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6365200.htmlnIbidnFor a survey of papers and articles, see chapter 3, “Reinventing the OPAC,” and chapter 4, “Library 2.0,” in Brad Eden, “Information Organization Future for Libraries,”

Library Technology Reports

, no. 6 (Nov./Dec. 2007)nDeana Groves, '“Online Work Tools: A Look at 20 Academic Libraries Technical Services Web Pages,”' Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services 29 no. 4 (2005): 395nIbid., 396nIbid., 400nKavita Mundle, Lisa Zhao, Nimala S. Bangalore, '“Evaluative Study of Catalog Department Web Pages,”' Library Resources & Technical Services 48 no. 2 (Jan. 2004): 48-58nKavita Mundle, Harvey Huie, Nimala S Bangalore, '“ARL Library Catalog Department Web Sites: An Evaluative Study,”' Library Resources & Technical Services 50 no 3 (July 2006): 173-95nIbid., 173, 182nIbid., 182nBrian C. Gray, 'Using Web 2.0 to Increase Effectiveness of Staff Training and Communication”' () (PowerPoint presentation, Ohio Library Council 2008 Technical Services Retreat, “Choosing our Tools for Tomorrow,” Apr. 1–2, 2008, Loudonville, Ohio): slide 7, nStefan Gradmann, '“rdfs:frbr—Towards an Implementation Model for Library Catalogs Using Semantic Web Technology,”' Cataloging & Classification Quarterly (2005) IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records,

Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records: Final Report

(Munich: K.G. Saur, 1998), nMagda A El-Sherbini, '“Cataloging and Classification: Review of the Literature 2005–06,”' Library Resources & Technical Services 52 no. 3 (July 2008): 159nWikipedia, '“Web 2.9,”' () (accessed Feb. 17, 2009)nIbid. (accessed Feb. 20, 2009)nR. David Lankes, Joanne Silverstein, Scott Nicholson, '“Participatory Networks: The Library as Conversation,”' Information Technology & Libraries 26 no. 4 (Dec. 2007): 23nIbidnJessica Dye, '“Collaboration 2.0: Make the Web Your Workspace,”' EContent 30 no. 1 (Jan./Feb. 2007): 32nIbidnDefinitions of Web 2.0 applications in this paper are taken from Ellyssa Kroski,

Web 2.0 for Librarians and Information Professionals

(New York: Neal-Schuman, 2008)nWikipedia, '“Web widget,”' () (accessed Jan. 22, 2009)nKroski,

Web 2.0 for Librarians and Information Professionals

, 42nIbid., 45nMaureen Donovan, '“Meiji Publications,”' () online posting, June 24, 2006, Ohio State University Libraries Blogs, Japanese Publications, n

Downloads

Published

2011-04-29

Issue

Section

Articles