Toward a Computer-Generated Subject Validation File: Feasibility and Usefulness
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5860/lrts.42n1.45Abstract
Responding to the fact that the library community has long recognized the need for improved efficiency and reliability in subject authority control, we explored the feasibility of automatically creating a subject heading validation file by scanning the OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc. Online Union Catalog (OLUC). The premises were, first, that although the file would not be exhaustive, it would contain the majority of frequently used headings, and second, the predicted level of accuracy in the file would be high. In approach, we focused on finding the density and distribution of assigned headings and the relationship, if any, between density and error rate. We analyzed a sample file of Library of Congress-assigned headings from the OCLC Subject Headings Corrections database. The results of the study showed that (1) frequency of use and number of headings at a given rate of use are in inverse relationship; (2) a small number of headings with high frequencies of use accounts for a majority of total use, while a large proportion shows very low frequency of use; (3) topical headings account for about two-thirds of assigned headings; and (4) error and obsolescence rates are both low, and both are in inverse relationship to the frequency of heading use. We concluded that an automatically generated subject heading file is indeed feasible. Such a file would be useful for various purposes: to verify subject heading strings constructed by catalogers, to update subject, headings in catalog maintenance, and to validate subject headings during retrospective conversion.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC-BY-NC 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) after it has been accepted for publication. Sharing can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.