User Tags versus Subject Headings
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5860/lrts.53n3.174Abstract
Some members of the library community, including the Library of Congress Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control, have suggested that libraries should open up their catalogs to allow users to add descriptive tags to the bibliographic data in catalog records. The website LibraryThing currently permits its members to add such user tags to its records for books and therefore provides a useful resource to contrast with library bibliographic records. A comparison between the LibraryThing tags for a group of books and the library-supplied subject headings for the same books shows that users and catalogers approach these descriptors very differently. Because of these differences, user tags can enhance subject access to library materials, but they cannot entirely replace controlled vocabularies such as the Library of Congress subject headings.
References
Karen Antell, Jie Huang, '“Subject Searching Success: Transaction Logs, Patron Perceptions, and Implications for Library Instruction,”' Reference & User Services Quarterly 48 no. 1 (2008): 68-76n On the Record: Report of the Library of Congress Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control (: 2008) (accessed Feb. 23, 2009)nIbid., 34nLouise F. Spiteri, '“The Use of Folksonomies in Public Library Catalogues,”' Serials Librarian 51 no. 2 (2006): 75-89nDarlene Fichter, '“Intranet Applications for Tagging and Folksonomies,”' Online 30 no. 3 (2006): 43-46nIbid., 44nLouise F. Spiteri, '“Structure and Form of Folksonomy Tags: The Road to the Public Library Catalogue,”' Webology 4 no. 2 (2007): (accessed Oct. 1, 2008)www.webology.ir/2007/v4n2/a41.htmlnScott A. Golder, Bernardo A. Huberman, '“Usage Patterns of Collaborative Tagging Systems,”' Journal of Information Science 32 no. 2 (2006): 198-208nTimme Bisgaard Munk, Kristian Mørk, '“Folksonomies, Tagging Communities, and Tagging Strategies: An Empirical Study,”' Knowledge Organization 34 no. 3 (2007): 115-27nIbid., 116nGolder and Huberman, “Usage Patterns of Collaborative Tagging Systems.”nTimme Bisgaard Munk, Kristian Mørk, '“Folksonomy, the Power Law and the Significance of the Least Effort,”' Knowledge Organization 34 no. 1 (2007): 16-33nPauline Rafferty, Rob Hidderley, '“Flickr and Democratic Indexing: Dialogic Approaches to Indexing,”' Aslib Proceedings 59 no. 4/5 (2007): 397-410 John R. Clark, “The Internet Connection: Web 2.0, Flickr and Endless Possibilities,”
Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian
, no. 1 (2008): 62–64nMikael Wetterstrom, '“The Complementarity of Tags and LCSH: A Tagging Experiment and Investigation into Added Value in a New Zealand Library Context,”' The New Zealand Library & Information Management Journal, Ng Prongo 50 no. 4 (2008): 296-310nLibraryThing, Tagging, www.librarything.com/wiki/index.php/TaggingnLibraryThing, LibraryThing Concepts, www.librarything.com/concepts#whatnGolder and Huberman, “Usage Patterns of Collaborative Tagging Systems.”nEmma Tonkin, '“Collaborative and Social Tagging Networks,”' Ariadne 54 (2008): (accessed Feb. 23, 2009)www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue54n Subject Cataloging Manual, Subject Headings (Washington, D.C.: Library of Congress 1996): H180-nMunk and Mørk, “Folksonomies, Tagging Communities, and Tagging Strategies”: Munk and Mørk, “Folksonomy, the Power Law and the Significance of the Least Effort”; Golder and Huberman, “Usage Patterns of Collaborative Tagging Systems.”nWetterstrom, “The Complementarity of Tags and LCSH.”nLibrary of Congress, Cataloging Policy and Support Office,
Subject Cataloging Manual, Subject Headings
, H2055nThomas Mann, “ On the Record” but Off the Track: A Review of the Report of the Library of Congress Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control, with a Further Examination of Library of Congress Cataloging Tendencies (Washington, D.C.: AFSCME 2910 2008) (accessed Oct. 1, 2008); Thomas Mann, “The Peloponnesian War and the Future of Reference, Cataloging, and Scholarship in Research Libraries,”
Journal of Library Metadata
, no. 1 (2008): 53–100nGene Smith, '“Tagging: Emerging Trends,”' Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 34 no. 6 (2008): 14-17nLibraryThing, Tag Combining, www.librarything.com/wiki/index.php/Tag_combiningnSpiteri, “The Use of Folksonomies in Public Library Catalogues.”nLibrary of Congress, Cataloging Policy and Support Office,
Subject Cataloging Manual, Subject Headings
, H202nM. M. Moss, '“Politically Incorrect Descriptors,”' Technicalities 17 no. 3 (1997): 12-14 Hope A. Olson,
The Power to Name: Locating the Limits of Subject Representation in Libraries
(Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer, 2002); Sanford Berman,
Prejudices and Antipathies: A Tract on the LC Subject Heads Concerning People
(Metuchen, N.J.: Scarecrow, 1971)nJames D. Anderson, Melissa A. Hoffman, '“A Fully Faceted Syntax for Library of Congress Subject Headings,”' Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 43 no. 1 (2006): 7-38nLibrary of Congress Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control,
On the Record
, 35n
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC-BY-NC 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) after it has been accepted for publication. Sharing can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
