<i>FRBR</i> Principles Applied to a Local Online Journal Finding Aid
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5860/lrts.51n2.134Abstract
This paper presents a case study in the development of an online journal finding aid at the University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign (UIUC), with particular emphasis on cataloging issues. Although not consciously designed according to Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) principles, the Online Research Resources (ORR) system has proved amenable to FRBR analysis. The FRBR model was helpful in examining the user tasks to be served by the system, the appropriate data structure for the system, and the feasibility of mapping the required data from existing sources. The application of the FRBR model to serial publications, however, raises important questions for the model itself, particularly concerning the treatment of work-to-work relationships.
References
Kristin Antelman, '“Identifying the Serial Work as a Bibliographic Entity,”' Library Resources & Technical Services 48 no. 4 (Oct. 2004): 249nEd Jones, '“The FRBR Model as Applied to Continuing Resources,”' Library Resources & Technical Services 49 no. 4 (Oct. 2005): 233n () Lisa German, Wendy Shelburne, and Michael Norman, “Creating the Ultimate Knowledge Base,” (presentation at the 25th annual Charleston conference, Nov. 2004, Charleston, South Carolina). nJanis F. Brown, Janet L. Nelson, Maggie Wineburgh-Freed, '“Customized Electronic Resources Management System for a Multi-Library University: Viewpoint from One Library,”' The Serials Librarian 47 no. 4 (2005): 89-102 Laura Tull et al., “Integrating and Streamlining Electronic Resources Workflows via Innovative’s Electronic Resource Management,”
The Serials Librarian
, no. 4(2005): 103–24n Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records: Final Report (Munich: K.G. Saur 1998)nIbid., section 6nBarbara Tillett, What Is FRBR? A Conceptual Model for the Bibliographic Universe (Washington, D.C.: Library of Congress Cataloging Distribution Service 2004): 5- (accessed Jan. 27, 2006)n () Barbara Tillett, “Component Parts,” online posting, Nov. 20, 2003, FRBR mailing list. nAntelman, “Identifying the Serial Work,” 241n Anglo-American Cataloging Rules (Ottawa: Canadian Library Assn. 1998) rev. London: Library Assn. Publishing; Chicago: ALA, 1998)nMartha Yee, '“FRBRization: A Method for Turning Online Public Finding Lists into Online Public Catalogs,”' Information Technology and Libraries 24 no. 3 (Sept. 2005): 79-95nIFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records,
Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records
, section 4.4nIbid., section 4.3nNaomi Kietzke Young, '“The Aggregator-Neutral Record: New Procedures for Cataloging Continuing Resources,”' The Serials Librarian 45 no. 4 (2004): 37-42nMary-Louise Ayres, '“Case Studies in Implementing Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR): AustLit and MusicAustralia,”' Australian Library Journal 54 no. 1 (Feb. 2005): 43-54 Gunilla Jonsson, “Cataloging of Hand Press Materials and the Concept of Expression in FRBR,”
Cataloging & Classification Quarterly
, no. 3/4 (2005): 77–86; Yann Nicolas, “Folklore Requirements for Bibliographic Records: Oral Traditions and FRBR,”
Cataloging & Classification Quarterly
, no. 3/4(2005): 179–95nIFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records,
Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records
, 19nDavid Mimno, Gregory Crane, Alison Jones, '“Hierarchical Catalog Records: Implementing a FRBR Catalog,”' D-Lib Magazine 11 no. 10 (Oct. 2005): (accessed Aug. 4, 2006)www.dlib.org/dlib/october05/crane/10crane.htmlnThomas Hickey, Edward O’Neill, '“FRBRizing OCLC’s WorldCat,”' Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 39 no. 3/4 (2005): 239-51n CONSER Cataloging Manual (Washington, D.C.: Library of Congress 2002) module 5.1n () Indecs,
Putting Metadata to Rights: Summary Final Report
(2000). nIFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records,
Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records
, section 5.3nKetil Albertsen, Carol van Nuys, '“Paradigma: FRBR and Digital Documents,”' Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 39 no. 3/4 (2005): 125-49n () Steve Shadle, “FRBR and Serials” (presentation at the 2005 NASIG annual conference, May 2005, Minneapolis, Minn.). nTom Delsey, FRBR and Serials (The Hague: IFLA 2003) (accessed Jan. 27, 2006)n () Frieda Rosenberg and Diane Hillman, “An Approach to Serials with FRBR in Mind” (draft, revised Jan. 24, 2004). nIFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records,
Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records
, section 5.3.4nShadle, “FRBR and Serials.”nRobert Alan, '“Linking Successive Entries Based upon the OCLC Control Number, ISSN, or LCCN,”' Library Resources & Technical Services 37 no. 4 (1993): 410nAntelman, “Identifying the Serial Work,” 244n () Barbara Tillett, “Bibliographic Universe Created by FRBR and FRAR” (presentation at the FRBR satellite meeting of the 2005 IFLA conference, Jarvenpaa, Finland, Aug. 2005). n ()
CONSERLINE
no. 26 (Spring 2005). nJones, “The FRBR Model as Applied to Continuing Resources,” 231n
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC-BY-NC 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) after it has been accepted for publication. Sharing can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
