Flexibility in the Face of Change
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5860/lrts.57n1.77Abstract
The serials literature for 2010–11 reflects the need for all members of the serials information chain to demonstrate flexibility in the face of constant change. Both the current economic context and the rapid development of technology are providing users with more options than ever before for fulfilling their information needs. The literature reflects this and the actions that members of the serials information chain are taking to evaluate, measure, and deliver serials content in new and creative ways. The major themes in the serials literature—workflows and processes, access to serials, metrics, and changing user behavior—are described and illustrated using examples from a selection of materials published during 2010–11.
References
Leigh Chatterton and Mary Elizabeth Clack, introduction to
The Serials Information Chain: Discussion, Debate, and Dialog: Proceedings of the North American Serials Interest Group 2nd Annual Conference June 14–17, 1987, Denison University, Granville, Ohio
(New York: Haworth, 1988): 1n 'Including Fileserver Information and Selected Command Options,” SERIALST (Serials in Libraries Discussion Forum), accessed August 31' () 2012, nPatrick L. Carr, “From Innovation to Transformation: A Review of the 2006–7 Serials Literature,”
Library Resources & Technical Services
, no. 1 (January 2009): 3–14; Maria Collins, “Serials Literature Review 2008–9: Embracing a Culture of Openness,”
Library Resources & Technical Services
, no. 2 (April 2011): 60–80.nSusan H Zappen, '“Managing Resources to Maximize Serials Access: The Case of the Small Liberal Arts College Library,”' Serials Librarian 59 no. 3/4 (2010): 346-59 Mary K. Throumoulos, “Exceptional Service During and After Deep Serial Cuts,”
Bottom Line: Managing Library Finances
, no. 1(2010): 24–28.nZappen, “Managing Resources to Maximize Serials Access,” 349.nZappen, “Managing Resources to Maximize Serials Access.”nLorraine Busby, “Our Friends Are Killing Us,”
Serials Librarian
, no. 2 (2011): 160–67.nAllen Powell, “Times of Crisis Accelerate Inevitable Change,”
Journal of Library Administration
, no. 1 (2011): 105–29.nZappen, “Managing Resources to Maximize Serials Access”; Powell, “Times of Crisis Accelerate Inevitable Change”; Angela Riggio, Bonnie Tijerina, and Eleanor I. Cook, “Don’t Pay Twice! Leveraging Licenses to Lower Student Costs,”
Serials Librarian
, no. 1/4 (2011): 153–57.nKittie S. Henderson and Stephen Bosch, “Seeking the New Normal,”
Library Journal
, no. 7 (April 15, 2010): 37.nLisa Spagnolo, Buddy Pennington, and Kathy Carter, “Serials Management Transitions in Turbulent Times,”
Serials Review
, no. 3 (2010): 161–66.nIbid., 162.nSpagnolo, Pennington, and Carter, “Serials Management Transitions in Turbulent Times.”nPaula Sullenger, “A Serials Format Inventory Project: How Far Can Academic Libraries Go with ‘Electronic Only’?”
Serials Review
, no. 3 (2011): 176.nLisa Pate, '“Check in/Maintain/Catalog Serials,”' () SERIALST, April 252011, nJonathan Blackburn, Sylvia A Lowden, '“Not for the Faint of Heart! A New Approach to Serials Management,”' Serials Librarian 60, no (): 1/4 (January 2011): 72.nClint Chamberlain., “Serials Management in the Next-Generation Library Environment,”
Serials Librarian
, no. 1–4 (January 2011): 38.nDina Tbaishat, “Using Business Process Modeling to Examine Academic Library Activities for Periodicals,”
Library Management
, no. 7 (November 2010): 480–93.nDonald Taylor, Frances Dodd, James Murphy, '“Open-Source Electronic Resource Management System: A Collaborative Implementation,”' Serials Librarian 58 no. 1/4 (June 2010): 61-72n'“Not for the Faint of Heart! A New Approach to Serials Management,”' Serials Librarian 60, no (): 1/4 (2011): 61.nIbid., 72.nIbid., 73.nIbid.nSpagnolo, Pennington, and Carter, “Serials Management Transitions in Turbulent Times.”nIbid., 162.nDavid R. Fritsch and Rachel Lee, “It’s Time to Join Forces: New Approaches and Models That Support Sustainable Scholarship,”
Serials Librarian
, no. 1/4 (2011): 75–82.nIbid., 79.nIbid., 79–80.nRoger C. Schonfeld, “What to Withdraw? Print Collection Management in the Wake of Digitization,”
Serials Librarian
, no. 1/4 (January 2011): 141–45.nLaurel Ivy Sammond, recorder, and Ross Housewright, presenter, “Print Collections Management in the Wake of Digitization,”
Serials Librarian
, no. 2 (September 2011): 193–95.nKristen Blake and Maria Collins, “Controlling Chaos: Management of Electronic Journal Holdings in an Academic Library Environment,”
Serials Review
, no. 4 (December 2010): 242–50.nKjell Tjensvoll, “National Licensing for the Norwegian Electronic Health Library,”
Serials
, no. 1 (2011): 52–55.n“About Best Practice,” BMJ Group, accessed September 19, 2012, http://bestpractice.bmj.com/best-practice/marketing/about-best-practice.htmlnLiam Earney, “On the Advantages of Negotiation: A Partial Response to Kjell Tjensvoll,”
Serials
, no. 3 (2011): 273–76.nGuoying Liu and Huoxin Zheng, “Access to Serials: Integrating SFX with Evergreen Open Source ILS,”
Library Hi Tech
, no. 1 (August 3, 2011): 137–48.nBlackburn and Lowden, “Not for the Faint of Heart!” 61.nIbid., 72.nIbid., 73.nIbidnLiu and Zheng, “Access to Serials.”nTaylor, Dodd, and Murphy, “Open-Source Electronic Resource Management System.”nKay G. Johnson, “Reflections on Changes in the Library and Serials Literature,”
Serials Review
, no. 4 (December 2010): 240–41.nKen Chad, “Open Library Environments,”
Serials
, no. 3 (November 2011): 216–19.nChamberlain., “Serials Management in the Next-Generation Library Environment.”nJeanette Skwor, '“Confirming E-Access Dates,” SERIALST, Nov. 2' () 2010, nSarah Pearson and Christian Box, “Driving Usage—What Are Publishers and Librarians Doing to Evaluate and Promote Usage?”
Serials
, no. 3 (November 2011): 231.nBaker Evans, “The Ubiquity of Mobile Devices in Universities—Usage and Expectations,”
Serials
, supplement 3 (November 2011): S11.nMartin White, “A World of Learning in the Palm of Your Hand,”
Serials
, supplement 3 (November 2011): S65–S70; Kent Anderson and Angela Dresselhaus, “Publishing 2.0: How the Internet Changes Publications in Society,” Serials Librarian 60, no. 1/4 (January 2011): 23–36; Evans, “The Ubiquity of Mobile Devices in Universities.”nMarty Picco, Kevin Cohn, and Bill Rosenblatt, “Any Time, Anywhere: Strategies for Mobile Content Delivery,”
Serials
, supplement 3 (November 2011): S43.nPhilippa Sheail, “‘Real Challenges in a Virtual World’ or ‘Can I Get Full Text from ERIC and What on Earth Is Dialog Datastar?’”
Serials
, no. 2 (January 1, 2010): 103–8nJeff Matlak, “What Drives Usage,”
Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship
, no. 3/4 (December 2010): 144–65.nAmy Fry, presenter, and Marcella Lesher, recorder, “Beyond Lists and Guides: Using Usability to Help Students Get the Most Out of E-Resources,”
Serials Librarian
, no. 1/4 (January 2011): 206–12.nOwen Stephens, “Mashups and Open Data in Libraries,”
Serials
, no. 3 (November 1, 2011): 245–50.nMike Beccaria, Roy Tennant, and Adam Traub, presenters; Sion Romaine, recorder, “Can’t We Write a Little Script for This? Managing Serials Data and xISSN,”
Serials Librarian
, no. 1/4 (2011): 181–85.nLiu and Zheng, “Access to Serials.”nMatlak, “What Drives Usage.”nJeff Wisniewski, “Web Scale Discovery: The Future’s So Bright, I Gotta Wear Shades,”
Online
, no. 4 (2010): 55–58.nHolly Mercer and Sharon Dyas-Correia, “Metadata Value Chain for Open-Access E-journals,”
Serials Librarian
, no. 1/4 (January 2011): 234–40.nIbid., 234.nRDA: Resource Description and Access (Chicago: ALA; Ottawa: Canadian Library Association; London: Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals, 2010)nLes Hawkins, Hien Nguyen, and Adolfo R. Tarango, “CONSER Update,”
Serials Librarian
, no. 1/4 (2011): 124–34.nMagda El-Sherbini, presenter; Megan Curran, recorder, “Resource Description and Access ‘RDA’: New Code for Cataloging,”
Serials Librarian
, no. 1/4 (2011): 7–15.nCheryl S. Collins and William H. Walters, “Open Access Journals in College Library Collections,”
Serials Librarian
, no. 2 (September 2010): 195.nStephen Bosch, Kittie Henderson, and Heather Klusendorf, “Periodicals Price Survey 2011: Under Pressure, Times Are Changing,” Library Journal (April 14, 2011), accessed September 10, 2012, www.libraryjournal.com/lj/newslettersnewsletterbucketacademicnewswire/890009–440/periodicals_price_survey_2011_under.html.cspnJudith M. Nixon, “A Reprise, or Round Three: Using a Database Management Program as a Decision-Support System for the Cancellation of Serials,”
Serials Librarian
, no. 3/4 (2010): 302–12.nDiane Carroll and Joel Cummings, “Data Driven Collection Assessment Using a Serial Decision Database,”
Serials Review
, no. 4 (December 2010): 227–39.nRachel Fleming-May, presenter, and Amanda N. Price, reporter, “Downloads or Outcomes?: Measuring and Communicating the Contributions of Library Resources to Faculty and Student Success,”
Serials Librarian
, no. 2 (2011): 197.nMatlak, “What Drives Usage,” 147.nPearson and Box, “Driving Usage—What Are Publishers and Librarians Doing to Evaluate and Promote Usage?” 226.nKittie S. Henderson and Stephen Bosch, “Seeking the New Normal,”
Library Journal
, no. 7 (April 15, 2010): 39.nMatlak, “What Drives Usage.”nWhite, “A World of Learning in the Palm of Your Hand,” S65.nPicco, Cohn, and Rosenblatt, “Any Time, Anywhere.”nFry, “Beyond Lists and Guides.”nRichard Padley, “HTML5—Bridging the Mobile Platform Gap: Mobile Technologies in Scholarly Communication,”
Serials
, supplement 3 (November 2011): S32–S39.nCharlie Rapple, “The Mobile World: One Non-Profit Publisher’s Journey,”
Serials
, supplement 3 (November 2011): S57–S64.nEvans, “The Ubiquity of Mobile Devices in Universities—Usage and Expectations.”nHenderson and Bosch, “Seeking the New Normal,” 39.n
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC-BY-NC 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) after it has been accepted for publication. Sharing can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
