Automated Metadata Harvesting: Low-Barrier MARC Record Generation from OAI-PMH Repository Stores Using MarcEdit

Authors

  • Terry Reese

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5860/lrts.53n2.121

Abstract

For libraries, the burgeoning corpus of born-digital data is becoming both a blessing and a curse. For patrons, these online resources represent the potential for extended access to materials, but for a library’s technical services department they represent an ongoing challenge, forcing staff to look for ways to capture and make use of available metadata. This challenge is exacerbated for libraries that provide access to their own digital collections. While digital repository software like DSpace, Fedora, and CONTENTdm expose bibliographic metadata through the Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting (OAI-PMH), few organizations have a simplified method for harvesting and generating Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC) records from these metadata stores. Fortunately, a number of tools have been developed that can facilitate the harvesting and generation of MARC data from these OAI-PMH metadata repositories. This paper will examine resources that enhance technical services staff’s ability to use existing metadata, with specific focus on one of these current generation tools, MarcEdit, which was developed by the author and provides a one-click harvesting process for generating MARC metadata from a variety of metadata formats.

References

Perry Willett, “University of Michigan Announces OAI Harvesting of MBooks,” online posting, Dec. 11, 2007, XML4Lib, http://lists.webjunction.org/wjlists/xml4lib/2007-December/005978.htmlnBrian Surratt, Dustin Hill, '“ETD2MARC: A Semi-Automated Workflow for Cataloging Electronic Theses and Dissertations,”' Library Collections & Technical Services 28 no. 2 (2004): also http://handle.tamu.edu/1969.1/588n'“Challenges and Issues with Metadata Crosswalks,”' Online Libraries & Microcomputer 20 no. 4 (Apr. 2002): 1-4nSurratt and Hill, “ETD2MARC: A Semi-Automated Workflow for Cataloging Electronic Theses and Dissertations.”nMartin Kurth, David Ruddy, Nathan Rupp, '“Repurposing MARC Metadata: Using Digital Project Experience to Develop a Metadata Management Design,”' Library Hi Tech 22 no. 2 (2004): 154-65 (accessed Dec. 22, 2008)http://lts.library.cornell.edu/lts/who/pre/upload/p153.pdfnTerry Reese, '“Bibliographic Freedom and the Future Direction of Map Cataloging,”' Journal of Map & Geography Libraries 2 no. 1 (2005): 67-97 (accessed Dec. 22, 2008)http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/dspace/handle/1957/16nGary Simons, Steven Bird, '“Building an Open Language Archives on the OAI Foundation,”' Library Hi Tech 21 no. 2 (2003): 210-18 Hussein Suleman and Edward A. Fox, “Leveraging OAI Harvesting to Disseminate Theses,”

Library Hi-Tech

, no. 2 (2003): 219–27nMartin Halbert, '“The Metascholar Initiative: AmericanSouth.org and MetaArchive.Org,”' Library Hi Tech 21 no. 2 (2003): 182-98nSarah L. Shreeves, '“Current Developments and Future Trends for the OAI Protocol for Metadata Harvesting,”' Library Trends 53 no. 4 (Spring 2005): 576-89nOpen Archives Initiative, PMH Tools, www.openarchives.org/pmh/tools/tools.phpnLibrary of Congress, MARC 21 XML schema stylesheet, www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/xslt/OAIMARC2MARC21slim.xslnDetails are available in the author’s description of this process: See Terry Reese, “Oregon State University Electronic Theses DSpace (OAI-PMH) to MARC21XML Crosswalk” http://hdl.handle.net/1957/6300nWillett, “University of Michigan Announces OAI Harvesting of MBooks.”n

Downloads

Published

2011-04-29

Issue

Section

Articles