A Review and Analysis of Library Availability Studies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5860/lrts.51n1.30Abstract
The concept of availability (can a library patron locate a desired item on a library’s shelves?) and Kantor’s branching method for identifying barriers to availability (acquisition, circulation, library operations, and the user) are described. A literature review identifies more than fifty investigations of availability reported in journal articles, dissertations, theses, or conference presentations during the last quarter century. The mean availability rates for known-item searches by actual patrons of 61.3 percent or 63.1 percent (depending on the calculation method) are quite similar to the 61 percent found in an earlier review covering the years 1934 to 1984. Analysis of availability in Kantor’s branches shows variation among libraries, but no branch standing out as a major barrier. The paper concludes with the argument that the traditional availability measure can be modified for use as an objective, user-centered evaluative tool in the electronic environment.
References
Barbara Lockett, Guide to the Evaluation of Library Collections (Chicago and London: ALA 1989)nA. N. Zainab, S. L. Ng, '“Availability and Overlap of Quality Computer Science Journal Holdings in Selected University Libraries in Malaysia,”' Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science 8 no. 1 (Jul. 2003): 45-63 John Mutter, Jim Milliot, and Karen Holt, “What Price Used Books?”
Publishers Weekly
, no. 39(Sept. 27, 2004): 31–34nPaul B. Kantor, Objective Performance Measures for Academic and Research Libraries (Washington, D.C.: ARL 1984) v.; D.H. Revill, “An Availability Survey in Cooperation with a School of Librarianship and Information Studies,”
Library Review
, no. 1 (1988): 17nAn approximate quotation from Herbert S. White’s presentation at Indiana University’s School of Library and Information Science, May 9, 2003nLynn B. Chandler, “Book Availability in the Cameron Village Regional Library” (master’s paper, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1998), 2nN. A. Jacobs, R. C. Young, '“Measuring Book Availability in an Academic Library: A Methodological Comparison,”' Journal of Documentation 51 no. 3 (Sept. 1995): 281-90 Anne Ciliberti et al., “Empty Handed? A Material Availability Study and Transaction Log Analysis Verification,”
Journal of Academic Librarianship
, no. 4 (Jul. 1998): 282–89nF.W. Lancaster,
If You Want to Evaluate Your Library
… , 2nd ed. (Champaign, Ill.: University of Illinois, Graduate School of Library and Information Science, 1993), 222nLockett,
Guide to the Evaluation of Library Collections
, 11–12; Jan Bachmann-Derthick and Sandra Spurlock, “Journal Availability at the University of New Mexico,” in
Advances in Serials Management
, vol. 3, eds. Jean G. Cook and Marcia Tuttle (Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Pr., 1989), 174nH. V. Gaskill, R. M. Dunbar, C.H. Brown, '“An Analytical Study of the Use of a College Library,”' Library Quarterly 4 no. 4 (Oct. 1934): 581nMichael K. Buckland, Book Availability and the Library User (New York: Pergamon 1975)nJohn Mansbridge, '“Availability Studies in Libraries,”' Library & Information Science Research 8 no. 4 (Oct./Dec. 1986): 299-314nPaul B. Kantor, '“Availability Analysis,”' Journal of the American Society for Information Science 27 (Sept./Oct. 1976): 311-19nJudith B. Wood, Julius J. Bremer, Susan A. Saraidaridis, '“Measurement of Service at a Public Library,”' Public Library Quarterly 2 no. 2 (Summer 1980): 49-57 Faraj Mohamed Kuraim, “The Principal Factors Causing Reader Frustration in a Public Library” (Ph.D. diss., Case Western Reserve University, 1983)nHaseeb F. Rashid, '“Book Availability as a Performance Measure of a Library: An Analysis of the Effectiveness of a Health Sciences Library,”' Journal of the American Society for Information Science 41 no. 7 (Oct. 1990): 501-7nAnne C. Ciliberti, '“Materials Availability: A Study of Academic Library Performance,”' College & Research Libraries 48 no. 6 (Nov. 1987): 513-27 Eugene S. Mitchell, Marie L. Radford, and Judith L. Hegg, “Book Availability: Academic Library Assessment,”
College & Research Libraries
, no. 1 (Jan. 1994): 47–55; Ciliberti et al., “Empty Handed? A Material Availability Study.”nn
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC-BY-NC 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) after it has been accepted for publication. Sharing can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
