Positioning Libraries for a New Bibliographic Universe
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5860/lrts.58n4.233Abstract
This paper surveys the English-language literature on cataloging and classification published during 2011 and 2012, covering both theory and application. A major theme of the literature centered on Resource Description and Access (RDA), as the period covered in this review includes the conclusion of the RDA test, revisions to RDA, and the implementation decision. Explorations in the theory and practical applications of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), upon which RDA is organized, are also heavily represented. Library involvement with linked data through the creation of prototypes and vocabularies are explored further during the period. Other areas covered in the review include: classification, controlled vocabularies and name authority, evaluation and history of cataloging, special formats cataloging, cataloging and discovery services, non-AACR2/RDA metadata, cataloging workflows, and the education and careers of catalogers.
References
()
Report and Recommendations of the U.S. RDA Test Coordinating Committee
(May 2011, revised for public release June 20, 2011), accessed May 9, 2014, n ()
Testing Resource Description and Access: U.S. National Libraries RDA Test Partners
, accessed May 9, 2014, n'United States RDA Test Coordinating Committee' Report and Recommendations ():nSylvia D. Hall-Ellis, Robert O. Ellett, '“Introduction,”' Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 49 no. 7–8 (September 2011): 567-71 dx.doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2011.618377nJudith A. Kuhagen, '“Training for the U.S. RDA Test,”' Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 49 no. 7–8 (September 2011): 572-81 dx.doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2011.616924nChristopher Cronin, '“From Testing to Implementation: Managing Full-Scale RDA Adoption at the University of Chicago,”' Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 49 no. 7–8 (September 2011): 626-46 dx.doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2011.616263nJennifer B. Young, Valerie Bross, '“Results of the CRCC Informal RDA Testing Task Force,”' Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 49 no. 7–8 (September 2011): 600-606 dx.doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2011.620223; Marjorie E. Bloss, “Testing RDA at Dominican University’s Graduate School of Library and Information Science: The Students’ Perspectives,”
Cataloging & Classification Quarterly
, no. 7–8 (September 2011): 582–99, dx.doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2011.616264; Kathryn La Barre et al., “Perspectives from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Participants in the U.S. National Libraries RDA Test,”
Cataloging & Classification Quarterly
, no. 3 (2011): 243–53nMegan Kettner, '“RDA Toolkit,”' Theological Librarianship 4 no. 1 (2011): 105-6 accessed May 9, 2014, journal.atla.com/ojs/index.php/theolib/article/view/175/464; Megan Curran, “RDA Toolkit – http://access.rdatoolkit.org/nLa Barre Ed., '“Testing RDA at Dominican University’s Graduate School”' (): “Perspectives from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.”nPeggy Johnson, '“From the Editor’s Desk,”' Technicalities 32 no. 1 (2012): 2-3nKevin M Randall, '“RDA: End of the World Postponed?,”' Serials Librarian 61 no. 3–4 (2011): 334-45 dx.doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2011.617297nBarbara B Tillett, '“Keeping Libraries Relevant in the Semantic Web with Resource Description and Access (RDA),”' Serials: The Journal for the Serials Community 24 no. 3 (2011): 266-72 dx.doi.org/10.1629/24266nAnne Welsh, Sue Batley,
Practical Cataloguing: AACR, RDA and MARC21
(Chicago: Neal-Schuman, 2012); Mary Beth Weber and Fay Angela Austin,
Describing Electronic, Digital, and Other Media Using AACR2 and RDA: A How-To-Do-It Manual and CD-ROM for Librarians
(New York: Neal-Schuman Publishers, 2011)nSevim McCutcheon, '“Designing Policy for Copy Cataloging in RDA,”' Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services 36 no. 3–4 (2012): 69-78 dx.doi.org/S1464905512000255nCataloging & Classification Quarterly 50 no. 5–7 (): (special issue, 2012), accessed May 15, 2014, www.tandfonline.com/toc/wccq20/50/5-7#.U3UFQBC04lInRichard P. Smiraglia, '“Be Careful What You Wish For: FRBR, Some Lacunae, A Review,”' Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 50 no. 5–7 (June 2012): 360-68 dx.doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2012.682254nPatrick Le Boeuf, '“Foreword,”' Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 50 no. 5–7 (June 2012): 355-59 dx.doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2012.682001nPatrick Le Boeuf, '“A Strange Model Named FRBRoo,”' Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 50 no. 5–7 (June 2012): 422-38 dx.doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2012.679222nShoichi Taniguchi, '“Viewing RDA from FRBR and FRAD: Does RDA Represent a Different Conceptual Model?,”' Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 50 no. 8 (November 2012): 929-43 dx.doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2012.712631nPat Riva, Chris Oliver, '“Evaluation of RDA as an Implementation of FRBR and FRAD,”' Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 50 no. 5–7 (2012): 564-86 dx.doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2012.680848nOksana L. Zavalina, '“Subject Access: Conceptual Models, Functional Requirements, and Empirical Data,”' Journal of Library Metadata 12 no. 2–3 (2012): 140-63 dx.doi.org/10.1080/19386389.2012.699829nMartin Doerr, Pat Riva, Maja Žumer, '“FRBR Entities: Identity and Identification,”' Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 50 no. 5–7 (2012): 517-41 dx.doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2012.681252nYin Zhang, Athena Salaba, '“What Do Users Tell Us about FRBR-Based Catalogs?,”' Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 50 no. 5–7 (2012): 705-23 dx.doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2012.682000nTami Morse, '“Mapping Relationships: Examining Bibliographic Relationships in Sheet Maps from Tillett to RDA,”' Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 50 no. 4 (2012): 225-48 dx.doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2012.657292n(): Ibid., 245nMary Z. Rose, '“The Ship Has Sailed and We Aren’t On It: How Catalogers Could Support User Tasks and Why We Won’t,”' Journal of Library Metadata 12 no. 2–3 (2012): 127-39 dx.doi.org/10.1080/19386389.2012.699828nStacy Allison-Cassin, '“The Possibility of the Infinite Library: Exploring the Conceptual Boundaries of Works and Texts of Bibliographic Description,”' Journal of Library Metadata 12 no. 2–3 (2012): 294-309 dx.doi.org/10.1080/19386389.2012.700606n'“An Integrated Approach to Metadata Interoperability Construction of a Conceptual Structure between MARC and FRBR,”' Library Resources & Technical Services 55 no. 1 (2011): 17-32 dx.doi.org/10.5860/lrts.55n1.17nMatt Enis, '“LC Announces Linked Data Modeling Initiative,”' Library Journal 137 no. 11 (2012): 20nCynthia Hodgson, '“MARBI Disbanded; New ALCTS/LITA Metadata Standards Committee Formed,”' Information Standards Quarterly 24 no. 2/3 (2012): 53 dx.doi.org/10.3789/isqv24n2-3.2012.11n ()
Bibliographic Framework as a Web of Data: Linked Data Model and Supporting Services
(Washington, DC: Library of Congress, 2012), accessed May 10, 2014, nKevin Ford, '“LC’s Bibliographic Framework Initiative and the Attractiveness of Linked Data,”' Information Standards Quarterly 24 no. 2/3 (2012): 48 dx.doi.org/10.3789/isqv24n2-3.2012.09nKaren Coyle, '“Metadata Elements,”' Library Technology Reports 48 no. 4 (2012): 15-26 dx.doi.org/10.5860/ltr.48n4n'“The Academy Unbound,”' Library Resources & Technical Services 56 no. 4 (2012): 227-37 dx.doi.org/10.5860/lrts.56n4.227n'“Bibliographic Framework as a Web of Data.”' ():n'“W3C Library Linked Data Incubator Group Issues Final Report,”' Information Standards Quarterly 23 no. 4 (2011): 28 dx.doi.org/10.3789/isqv23n4.2011.08nMichael A. Keller,
Be Part of the Web, Not Just On It: Report of the Stanford Linked Data Workshop, 27 June–1 July 2011
(Stanford, 2011), accessed May 10, 2014, lib.stanford.edu/files/Stanford_Linked_Data_Workshop_Report_FINAL.pdfnAnne-Lena Westrum, Asgeir Rekkavik, Magnus Enger, '“The Key to the Future of the Library Catalog Is Openness,”' Computers in Libraries 31 no. 3 (2011): 10-14 Anne-Lena Westrum, Asgeir Rekkavik, and Kim Talleras, “Improving the Presentation of Library Data Using FRBR and Linked Data,”
Code4Lib Journal
, no. 16(2012): 1–7, accessed May 10, journal.code4lib.org/articles/6424nTed Fons, Jeff Penka, Richard Wallis, '“OCLC’s Linked Data Initiative: Using Schema.org to Make Library Data Relevant on the Web,”' Information Standards Quarterly 24 no. 2/3 (January 2012): 29 dx.doi.org/10.3789/isqv24n2-3.2012.05nAntoine Isaac, Robina Clayphan, Bernhard Haslhofer, '“Europeana: Moving to Linked Open Data,”' Information Standards Quarterly 24 no. 2/3 (January 2012): 34 accessed May 10, 2014, www.niso.org/publications/isq/2012/v24no2-3/isaacnJane Stevenson, '“Linking Lives: Creating An End-User Interface Using Linked Data,”' Information Standards Quarterly 24 no. 2/3 (January 2012): 14-23 dx.doi.org/10.3789/isqv24n2-3.2012.03nSeth Van Hooland, Ruben Verborgh, Rik Van de Walle, '“Joining the Linked Data Cloud in a Cost-Effective Manner,”' Information Standards Quarterly 24 no. 2/3 (January 2012): 24-28 dx.doi.org/10.3789/isqv24n2-3.2012.04nGordon Dunsire, '“Representing the FR Family in the Semantic Web,”' Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 50 no. 5–7 (June 2012): 724-41 dx.doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2012.679881nThomas Baker, '“Libraries, Languages of Description, and Linked Data: A Dublin Core Perspective,”' Library Hi Tech 30 no. 1 (2012): 116-33 dx.doi.org/10.1108/07378831211213256nRonald J. Murray, Barbara B. Tillett, '“Cataloging Theory in Search of Graph Theory and Other Ivory Towers,”' Information Technology & Libraries 30 no. 4 (2011): 170-84 acessed May 10, 2014, ejournals.bc.edu/ojs/index.php/ital/article/view/1868nLynne C. Howarth, '“FRBR and Linked Data: Connecting FRBR and Linked Data,”' Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 50 no. 5–7 (2012): 763-76 dx.doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2012.680835; Le Boeuf, “A Strange Model Named FRBRoo.”nDick R. Miller, '“Identities and Relationships: Parallels Between Metadata and Professional Relevance,”' Journal of the Medical Library Association 100 no. 2 (2012): 83-86 dx.doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.100.2.003nMartha Yee, Elaine R. Sanchez Ed., '“The Single Shared Catalog Revisited,”
in
' Conversations with Catalogers in the 21st Century (Santa Barbara California: Libraries Unlimited 2011): 129-nKaren Coyle, '“Vocabularies: Term Lists and Thesauri,”' Library Technology Reports 48 no. 4 (2012): 27-36 dx.doi.org/10.5860/ltr.48n4nJulie Allinson, '“OpenART: Open Metadata for Art Research at the Tate,”' Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science & Technology 38 no. 3 (2012): 43-8 dx.doi.org/10.1002/bult.2012.1720380311nMaria Nisheva-Pavlova, Pavel Pavlov, '“Ontology-Based Search and Document Retrieval in a Digital Library with Folk Songs,”' Information Services & Use 31 no. 3/4 (2011): 157-66nM. Cristina Pattuelli, '“Modeling a Domain Ontology for Cultural Heritage Resources: A User-Centered Approach,”' Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 62 no. 2 (2011): 314-42 dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.21453nMarjorie Hlava, '“Developing an Eclectic Terminology Registry,”' Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science & Technology 37 no. 4 (2011): 19-22 dx.doi.org/10.1002/bult.2011.1720370406nJon Phipps, Diane Hillmann, '“The Open Metadata Registry: An Update,”' Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science & Technology 37 no. 4 (2011): 35-7 dx.doi.org/10.1002/bult.2011.1720370410nGordon Dunsire, '“Linked Data Vocabulary Management: Infrastructure Support, Data Integration, and Interoperability,”' Information Standards Quarterly 24 no. 2/3 (2012): 4 dx.doi.org/10.3789/isqv24n2-3.2012.02nVanda Broughton,
Essential Library of Congress Subject Headings
, U.S. Editi (New York: Neal-Schuman Publishers, 2012)nHelen Greenblatt, Helen Greenblatt Ed., '“The Treatment of LGBTIQ Concepts in the Library of Congress Subject Headings,”'
in
Serving LBGTIQ Library and Archives Users (Jefferson, N.C.: McFarland, 2011), 212–28; K. R. Roberto, “Inflexible Bodies,”
Journal of Information Ethics
, no. 2 (September 01, 2011): 56–64, dx.doi.org/10.3172/JIE.20.2.56nDeborah Lee, '“Indigenous Knowledge Organization: A Study of Concepts, Terminology, Structure and (Mostly) Indigenous Voices,”' Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library & Information Practice & Research 6 no. 1 (2011): 1-33nC. Rockelle Strader, '“Citation Analysis,”' Library Resources & Technical Services 56 no. 4 (2012): 238-53 dx.doi.org/10.5860/lrts.56n4.238nJohn Porter, '“Folksonomies in the Library: Their Impact on User Experience, and Their Implications for the Work of Librarians,”' Australian Library Journal 60 no. 3 (2011): 248-55 dx.doi.org/10.1080/00049670.2011.10722621nGetaneh Alemu, Brett Stevens, Penny Ross, '“Towards a Conceptual Framework for User-Driven Semantic Metadata Interoperability in Digital Libraries: A Social Constructivist Approach,”' New Library World 113 no. 1/2 (2012): 38-54 dx.doi.org/10.1108/03074801211199031nMary M. Somerville, Dana Echohawk, '“Recuerdos Hablados/Memories Spoken: Toward the Co-Creation of Digital Knowledge with Community Significance,”' Library Trends 59 no. 4 (2011): 650-62 dx.doi.org/10.1353/lib.2011.0018nSvein Anfinnsen, Gheorghita Ghinea, Sergio de Cesare, '“Web 2.0 and Folksonomies in a Library Context,”' International Journal of Information Management 31 no. 1 (February 2011): 63-70 dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.05.006; Danielle H. Lee and Titus Schleyer, “Social Tagging Is No Substitute for Controlled Indexing: A Comparison of Medical Subject Headings and CiteULike Tags Assigned to 231,388 Papers,”
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
, no. 9 (September 17, 2012): 1747–57, dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.22653; Besiki Stvilia, Corinne Jörgensen, and Shuheng Wu, “Establishing the Value of Socially-Created Metadata to Image Indexing,”
Library & Information Science Research
, no. 2 (April 2012): 99–109, dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2011.07.011nChristine DeZelar-Tiedman, '“Exploring User-Contributed Metadata’s Potential to Enhance Access to Literary Works,”' Library Resources & Technical Services 55 no. 4 (2011): 221-33 dx.doi.org/10.5860/lrts.55n4.221nCarrie Pirmann, '“Tags in the Catalogue: Insights From a Usability Study of LibraryThing for Libraries,”' Library Trends 61 no. 1 (2012): 234-47 dx.doi.org/10.1353/lib.2012.0021n'“The Virtual International Authority File,”' Technical Services Quarterly 28 no. 2 (2011): 255-56nF. X. Nuttall, Sam G. Oh, '“Party Identifiers,”' Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 49 no. 6 (2011): 528-37 dx.doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2011.603075nBob Thomas, '“Name Disambiguation—Learning From More User-Friendly Models,”' Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 49 no. 3 (2011): 223-32 dx.doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2011.560834nDavid Bainbridge, Michael B. Twidale, David M. Nichols, '“Interactive Context-Aware User-Driven Metadata Correction in Digital Libraries,”' International Journal on Digital Libraries 13 no. 1 (2012): 17-32 dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00799-012-0100-5n'“Brief Communication: Abridged Dewey-15 (2012) in Historical Perspectives,”' Knowledge Organization 39 no. 6 (2012): 466-68n'“The DDC 23rd Edition (2011): An Appraisal,”' SRELS Journal of Information Management 49 no. 1 (2012): 1-4nKeith Trickey, '“Maddeningly Dynamic,”' CILIP Update 10 no. 11 (2011): 44-5nRebecca Green, '“See-Also Relationships in the Dewey Decimal Classification,”' Knowledge Organization 38 no. 4 (2011): 335-41nMathias Lösch, '“Building a DDC-Annotated Corpus from OAI Metadata,”' JODI: Journal of Digital Information 12 no. 2 (2011): 1-9 accessed May 10, 2014, journals.tdl.org/jodi/index.php/jodi/article/view/1765nArash Joorabchi, Abdulhussain E. Mahdi, '“An Unsupervised Approach to Automatic Classification of Scientific Literature Utilizing Bibliographic Metadata,”' Journal of Information Science 37 no. 5 (2011): 499-514 dx.doi.org/10.1177/0165551511417785nColin Higgins, '“Library of Congress Classification: Teddy Roosevelt’s World in Numbers?,”' Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 50 no. 4 (2012): 254 dx.doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2012.658989nIbid., 254nSherman Clarke, '“Class N, or, Classifying the Fine Arts Using the Library of Congress Classification,”' Art Libraries Journal 36 no. 4 (2011): 22-5nDeborah Lee, '“Dealing with Adaptation: The Courtauld Classification Scheme,”' Art Libraries Journal 36 no. 4 (2011): 26-33nCarlo Bianchini, '“Arrangement of FRBR Entities in Colon Classification Call Numbers,”' Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 50 no. 5–7 (2012): 473-93 dx.doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2012.679877nMaria White, '“Brackets and Flying Commas: UDC in Tate Library,”' Art Libraries Journal 36 no. 4 (2011): 13-17nKeith C. Mages, '“The Bellevue Classification System: Nursing’s Voice Upon the Library Shelves,”' Journal of the Medical Library Association 99 no. 1 (2011): 40-50 dx.doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.99.1.008nIbid., 48nErin Stalberg, Christopher Cronin, '“Assessing the Cost and Value of Bibliographic Control,”' Library Resources & Technical Services 55 no. 3 (2011): 124-37 dx.doi.org/10.5860/lrts.55n3.124nOn the Record: Report of the Library of Congress Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control (2008): accessed May 10, 2014, www.loc.gov/bibliographic-future/news/lcwg-ontherecord-jan08-final.pdfn'“The International Cataloguing Principles and Their Future,”' Italian Journal of Library & Information Science 3 no. 1 (2012): 4936.1-17 dx.doi.org/10.4403/jlis.it-4936nMichele Seikel, Thomas Steele, '“How MARC Has Changed: The History of the Format and Its Forthcoming Relationship to RDA,”' Technical Services Quarterly 28 no. 3 (2011): 322-34 dx.doi.org/10.1080/07317131.2011.574519nFrancis Miksa, '“The Legacy of the Library Catalogue for the Present,”' Library Trends 61 no. 1 (2012): 7-34 dx.doi.org/10.1353/lib.2012.0023nJoan C. Biella, Heidi G. Lerner, '“The RDA Test and Hebraica Cataloging: Applying RDA in One Cataloging Community,”' Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 49 no. 7–8 (2011): 676-95 dx.doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2011.616450nYoko Kudo, '“Modified Hepburn Romanization System in Japanese Language Cataloging: Where to Look, What to Follow,”' Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 49 no. 2 (2011): 97-120 dx.doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2011.536751nGeoff Husic, '“Romani Language: Cataloging Ramifications for a Language in the Process of Standardization,”' Slavic & East European Information Resources 12 no. 1 (2011): 37-51 dx.doi.org/10.1080/15228886.2011.556076nPeter H. Lisius Ed., Richard Griscom Ed., Directions in Music Cataloging (Middleton, WI: Music Library Association 2012)nGail Thornburg, W. Michael Oskins, '“Matching Music: Clustering Versus Distinguishing Records in a Large Database,”' OCLC Systems & Services 28 no. 1 (2012): 32-42 dx.doi.org/10.1108/10650751211197059nJenn Riley, '“Leveraging the FRBR Model for Music Discovery and Data Sharing: Autobiographical Note,”' OCLC Systems & Services 27 no. 3 (2011): 175-89 dx.doi.org/10.1108/10650751111164551; Jenn Riley, “Scherzo Music Discovery System at Indiana University,”
Cataloging & Classification Quarterly
, no. 2(2011): 144, dx.doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2011.544054nFontesArtisMusicae
no. 3 (2012, Special Issue)nJean Harden, '“Cataloguing in 2012: On the Cusp of RDA,”' Fontes Artis Musicae 59 no. 3 (2012): 253nAnders Cato, '“Music Cataloguing in Europe and RDA: Current Practises Challenged by New Rules,”' Fontes Artis Musicae 59 no. 3 (2012): 270-85nMark McKnight, '“Are We There Yet? Toward a Workable Controlled Vocabulary for Music,”' Fontes Artis Musicae 59 no. 3 (2012): 286-92n'“Who’s Doing What? Findability and Author-Supplied ETD Metadata in the Library Catalog,”' Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 49 no. 4 (2011): 277-310 dx.doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2011.573440nIbid., 306nRachel I. Howard, Tyler Goldberg, '“Facilitating Greater Access to ETDs Through CONTENTdm,”' OCLC Systems & Services 27 no. 2 (2011): 113-23 dx.doi.org/10.1108/10650751111135418nBarbara Schultz-Jones, '“Historical and Current Implications of Cataloguing Quality for Next-Generation Catalogues,”' Library Trends 61 no. 1 (2012): 49-82 dx.doi.org/10.1353/lib.2012.0028nIbid., 78nJoshua Barton, Lucas Mak, '“Old Hopes, New Possibilities: Next-Generation Catalogues and the Centralization of Access,”' Library Trends 61 no. 1 (2012): 83-106 dx.doi.org/10.1353/lib.2012.0030nMyung-Ja Han, '“New Discovery Services and Library Bibliographic Control,”' Library Trends 61 no. 1 (2012): 162-72 dx.doi.org/10.1353/lib.2012.0025; Tonia Graves and Angela Dresselhaus, “One Academic Library—One Year of Web-Scale Discovery,” Serials Librarian 62, no. 1–4(2012): 169–75; Jeffrey Daniels and Patrick Roth, “Incorporating Millennium Catalog Records into Serials Solutions’ Summon,”
Technical Services Quarterly
, no. 3 (2012): 193–99, dx.doi.org/10.1080/07317131.2012.681283nSusan C. Wynne, Martha J. Hanscom, '“The Effect of Next-Generation Catalogs on Catalogers and Cataloging Functions in Academic Libraries,”' Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 49 no. 3 (2011): 179-207 dx.doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2011.559899nPamela Harpel-Burke, '“Catalog Maintenance in the Discovery System: Opinions of Early Adopters,”' College & Undergraduate Libraries 19 no. 2–4 (2012): 246-63 dx.doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2012.693363nLarisa Walsh, '“The Faceted Catalog as a Tool for Searching Monographic Series: Usability Study of Lens,”' Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 50 no. 1 (2012): 43-59 dx.doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2011.610433; William Denton and Sarah J. Coysh, “Usability Testing of VuFind at an Academic Library,”
Library Hi Tech
, no. 2(2011): 301–19, dx.doi.org/10.1108/07378831111138189; Debra G. Skinner, “A Comparison of Searching Functionality of a VuFind Catalogue Implementation and the Traditional Catalogue,”
Library Trends
, no. 1 (2012): 208–17, dx.doi.org/10.1353/lib.2012.0031nKathleen Bauer, Alice Peterson-Hart, '“Does Faceted Display in a Library Catalog Increase Use of Subject Headings?,”' Library Hi Tech 30 no. 2 (2012): 347-58 dx.doi.org/10.1108/07378831211240003nIbid., 354nSteven J. Miller, Metadata for Digital Collections: A How To Do It Manual (New York: Neal-Schuman 2011)nDitte Laursen, Kåre Fiedler Christiansen, Lars Lundegård Olsen, '“Management of Metadata for Digital Heritage Collections,”' Microform & Digitization Review 41 no. 3–4 (2012): 151-58 dx.doi.org/10.1515/mir-2012-0024nKristin E. Martin, '“Marrying Local Metadata Needs With Accepted Standards: The Creation of a Data Dictionary at the University of Illinois at Chicago,”' Journal of Library Metadata 11 no. 1 (2011): 33-50 dx.doi.org/10.1080/19386389.2011.545006; Silvia B. Southwick and Cory Lampert, “Metadata Dictionary Database: A Proposed Tool for Academic Library Metadata Management,”
Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship
, no. 4(2011): 339–60, dx.doi.org/10.1080/1941126X.2011.627053nMaureen P. Walsh, '“Repurposing MARC Metadata for an Institutional Repository: Working with Special Collections and University Press Monographs,”' Library Resources & Technical Services 55 no. 1 (2011): 33-44nTracy Guza, '“The Seattle Public Library Century 21 Collection: Balancing Metadata Complexity, Processing Expediency, and User Experience,”' PNLA Quarterly 75 no. 3 (2011): 92-104 Mark A. Greene and Dennis Meissner, “More Product, Less Process: Revamping Traditional Archival Processing,”
American Archivist
, no. 2(2005): 208–63nRenée McBride, '“Look What We Got! How Inherited Data Drives Decision-Making: UNC-Chapel Hill’s 19th-Century American Sheet Music Collection,”' Code4Lib Journal no. 13 (2011): 1-20 accessed May 10, 2014, journal.code4lib.org/articles/4916nCynthia Tobar, '“Music to My Ears: The New York Philharmonic Digital Archives,”' D-Lib Magazine 17 no. 7/8 (2011): dx.doi.org/10.1045/july2011-tobarnR. Niccole Westbrook, '“Metadata Clean Sweep: A Digital Library Audit Project,”' D-Lib Magazine 18 no. 5/6 (2012): dx.doi.org/10.1045/may2012-westbrooknShirley Lim, Chern Li Liew, '“Metadata Quality and Interoperability of GLAM Digital Images,”' Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives 63 no. 5 (2011): 484-98 dx.doi.org/10.1108/00012531111164978n'“Libraries, Languages of Description, and Linked Data: A Dublin Core Perspective, 128.”'nRebecca L. Mugridge, Jeff Edmunds, '“Batchloading MARC Bibliographic Records: Current Practices and Future Challenges in Large Research Libraries,”' Library Resources & Technical Services 56 no. 3 (2012): 155-70 dx.doi.org/10.5860/lrts.56n3.155nPhilip Young, '“A Survey of Batch Cataloging Practices and Problems,”' Technical Services Quarterly 29 no. 1 (November 18, 2012): 22-41 10.1080/07317131.2012.624450nKristy L. Dixon, Lisa T. Nickel, '“MetaWHAT?: Training Access Services Staff to Partner in Digital Projects Metadata Creation,”' College & Research Libraries News 73 no. 2 (): 74-82 accessed May 10, 2014, crln.acrl.org/content/73/2/74nGwen Evans, Kellie Tilton, '“Creating an Un-Library Catalog: A Case Study in Managing Satellite Collections,”' Library Resources & Technical Services 55 no. 1 (2011): 45-53 dx.doi.org/10.5860/lrts.55n1.45nTeressa M. Keenan, '“Charting a Course With NOMAP: Integrating Metadata Workflows Into a Traditional Cataloging Unit,”' Journal of Library Metadata 12 no. 2–3 (2012): 199-212 dx.doi.org/10.1080/19386389.2012.699842nIbid., 210nCarrie A. Preston, '“Cooperative E-Book Cataloging in the OhioLINK Library Consortium,”' Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 49 no. 4 (2011): 257-76 dx.doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2011.571147nKristin E. Martin, '“Consortial Cataloging Guidelines for Electronic Resources: I-Share Survey and Recommendations,”' Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 49 no. 5 (June 2011): 361-86 dx.doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2011.588996nRogan Hamby, '“10% Wrong for 90% Done: A Practical Approach to Collection Deduping,”' Computers in Libraries 32 no. 4 (2012): 17-21n'“An Interview with Joseph Miller,”' Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 49 no. 2 (2011): 136-37 dx.doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2011.545343nSteven J. Miller, '“Online Cataloging Education at the University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee,”' Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 50 no. 2–3 (February 2012): 110-26 dx.doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2011.651193.; Kathryn La Barre, K. R. Roberto, and Faye Leibowitz, “The Common Gaze: Conversations with Cataloging Instructors about Teaching Online at the Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign,”
Cataloging & Classification Quarterly
, no. 2–3 (February 2012): 127–43, dx.doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2011.650840; Janet Swan Hill, “The Brick Wall: Attracting People to a Career in Cataloging,” in
Conversations with Catalogers in the 21st Century
, ed. Elaine R. Sanchez (Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited, 2011), 209–18; Sylvia D. Hall-Ellis, “Cataloging/Metadata and Library Science Education Programs for Catalogers and Metadata Specialists: Challenges for the Twenty-First Century,” in
Conversations with Catalogers in the 21st Century
, ed. Elaine R. Sanchez (Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited, 2011), 226–54; Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 50, no. 2–3: (special issue, 2012)nCataloging and Classification Quarterly 50 no. 2–3 (2012):n'“The Common Gaze: Conversations with Cataloging Instructors about Teaching Online at the Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaing,”' Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 50 no. 2-3 (2012): 127-43 dx.doi.org/10.1080/01639374.20111.650840; Gretchen L. Hoffman, “Using the Quality Matters Rubric to Improve Online Cataloging Courses,”
Cataloging & Classification Quarterly
, no. 2–3(2012): 158-71, dx.doi.org/10.1080.01639372.2011.651194; Morag Boyd,”From the Comfort of Your Office: Facilitating Learner-Centered Continuing Education in the Online Environment,”
Cataloging & Classification Quarterly
, no. 2–3 (2012): 189–203, dx.doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2011.651195nNatalia Gelber, Irina Kandarasheva, '“PCC Training for Copy Catalogers: Is It Worth the Investment? The Columbia University Libraries Experience,”' Library Resources & Technical Services 55 no. 3 (2011): 163-71 dx.doi.org/10.5860/lrts.55n3.163nGretchen L. Hoffman, '“Could the Functional Future of Bibliographic Control Change Cataloging Work? An Exploration Using Abbott,”' Journal of Library Metadata 12 no. 2–3 (2012): 111-26 dx.doi.org/10.1080/19386389.2012.699825nMichael A. Cerbo, '“Is There a Future for Library Catalogers?,”' Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 49 no. 4 (2011): 323-27 dx.doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2011.571504n'“The Academy Unbound,”' (): 232n'“Could the Functional Future of Bibliographic Control Change Cataloging Work?,”' (): 124n
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC-BY-NC 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) after it has been accepted for publication. Sharing can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
