Mass Management of E-Book Catalog Records
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5860/lrts.54n3.164Abstract
Electronic book collections in libraries have grown dramatically over the last decade. A great diversity of providers, service models, and content types exist today, presenting a variety of challenges for cataloging and catalog maintenance. Many libraries rely on external data providers to supply bibliographic records for electronic books, but cataloging guidance has focused primarily on rules and standards for individual records rather than data management at the collection level. This paper discusses the challenges, decisions, and priorities that have evolved around cataloging electronic books at a mid-size academic library, the University of Houston Libraries. The authors illustrate the various issues raised by vendor-supplied records and the impact of new guidelines for provider-neutral records for electronic monographs. They also describe workflow for batch cataloging using the MarcEdit utility, address ongoing maintenance of records and record sets, and suggest future directions for large-scale management of electronic books.
References
Susan Gibbons, Thomas A. Peters, Robin Bryan, E-Book Functionality: What Libraries and Their Patrons Want and Expect from Electronic Books (Chicago: ALA 2003): 3-nJacqueline Belanger, '“Cataloguing E-Books in UK Higher Education Libraries: Report of a Survey,”' Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems 41 no. 3 (2007): 203-16nJudy Luther, Streamlining Book Metadata Workflow: A White Paper prepared for the National Information Standards Organization (NISO) and OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc. (Baltimore: NISO 2009)nBecky Culbertson, Yael Mandelstam, George Prager, Provider-Neutral E-Monograph MARC Record Guide (Washington, D.C.: Program for Cooperative Cataloging 2009) (accessed Mar. 18, 2010)nElaine Sanchez, '“Cleanup of NetLibrary Cataloging Records: A Methodical Front-End Process,”' Technical Services Quarterly 23 no. 4 (2006): 51nIbid., 2nRobert Bothmann, '“Cataloging Electronic Books,”' Library Resources & Technical Services 48 no. 1 (2004): 12-19nKristin E. Martin, '“Cataloging eBooks: An Overview of Issues and Challenges,”' Against the Grain 19 no. 1 (2007): 45-47nIbid., 46nBetsy Simpson, Jimmie Lundgren, Tatiana Barr, '“Linking Print and Electronic Books,”' Library Resources & Technical Services 51 no. 2 (2007): 146-52nIbid., 151–52nJacqueline Belanger, “Cataloguing E-Books in UK Higher Education Libraries: Report of a Survey.”nIbid., 214nDonald T. Hawkins, '“Electronic Books: A Major Publishing Revolution: Part 2: The Marketplace,”' Online 24 no. 5 (2000): 36nLorcan Dempsey, “Ebooks and/or Digital Books” online posting, Lorcan Dempsey’s Weblog on Libraries, Services and Networks, Aug. 20, 2009, http://orweblog.oclc.org/archives/001999.htmlnMick O’Leary, '“Ebook Scenarios,”' Online 25 no. 1 (2001): 62-64nCulbertson, Mandelstam, and Prager,
Provider-Neutral E-Monograph MARC Record GuidenIbidn Library of Congress Rule Interpretations (Washington, D.C.: Library of Congress Cataloging Distribution Service 2002) 1.11AnBothmann, “Cataloging Electronic Books.”nAnne M. Mitchell, Brian E. Surratt, Cataloging and Organizing Digital Information: A How-To-Do-It Manual for Librarians (New York: Neal-Schuman 2005)nCulbertson, Mandelstam, and Prager,
Provider-Neutral E-Monograph MARC Record GuidenOregon State University, “MarcEdit—Your Complete Free MARC Editing Utility: About MarcEdit,” http://oregonstate.edu/∼reeset/marcedit/html/about.htmln“Provider-Neutral E-Monoraph Record Task Group Charge,” http://www.loc.gov/catdir/pcc/bibco/PN-Mono-charge.pdfn
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC-BY-NC 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) after it has been accepted for publication. Sharing can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.