Chapter 1: Web Scale Discovery <i>What and Why?</i>
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5860/ltr.47n1Abstract
Web scale discovery services for the library environment have the capacity to more easily connect researchers with the library's vast information repository. This includes locally held and hosted content, such as physical holdings, digital collections, and local institutional repositories. Perhaps more significantly, web scale discovery also accesses a huge array of remotely hosted content, often purchased or licensed by the library, such as publisher and aggregator content for tens of thousands of full-text journals, additional content from abstracting and indexing resources, and content from open access repositories.
This chapter defines web scale discovery and highlights a few key concepts essential for understanding these services. For anyone who has worked a reference interview and heard a student utter, “I couldn't find an article in the library catalog,” web scale discovery services hold tremendous potential. Extensive research on user expectations in the discovery arena, and the tools used by those seeking information—tools often disassociated from the library and often overlooking much of what the library holds and licenses—provide ample rationale for why web scale discovery is important for the library environment.
References
Marcia J. Bates,
Improving User Access to Library Catalog and Portal Information
, final report, version 3 (Washington, DC: Library of Congress, 2003), 4, www.loc.gov/catdir/bibcontrol/2.3BatesReport6-03.doc.pdfnRoger C. Schonfeld and Ross Housewright,
Faculty Survey 2009: Key Strategic Insights for Libraries, Publishers, and Societies
(New York: Ithaka S+R, 2010), 4, www.ithaka.org/ithaka-s-r/research/faculty-surveys-2000–;2009/Faculty%20Study%202009.pdfnOCLC,
Online Catalogs: What Users and Librarians Want
(Dublin, OH: OCLC, 2009), 20, www.oclc.org/reports/onlinecatalogs/fullreport.pdfnIbid., vi, 14.nKaren Calhoun,
The Changing Nature of the Catalog and Its Integration with Other Discovery Tools: Final Report
, (Washington, DC: Library of Congress, 2006), 35, www.loc.gov/catdir/calhoun-report-final.pdfnBibliographic Services Task Force,
Rethinking How We Provide Bibliographic Services for the University of California: Final Report
(University of California Libraries, 2005), 2, http://libraries.universityofcalifornia.edu/sopag/BSTF/Final.pdfnOCLC, College Students’ Perceptions of Libraries and Information Resources (Dublin, OH: OCLC, 2006), pt. 1, p. 4, www.oclc.org/reports/pdfs/studentperceptions.pdfnDoug Way, '“The Impact of Web-Scale Discovery on the Use of a Library Collection,”' Serials Review 36 no. 4 (2010): 214-220nBill Kelm, “WorldCat Local Effects at Willamette University.” July 21, 2010, presentation on Prezi, http://prezi.com/u84pzunpb0fa/worldcat-local-effects-at-wunJennifer Ward, Pam Mofjeld, Steve Shadle, '“WorldCat Local at the University of Washington Libraries,”' Library Technology Reports 44 no. 6 (2008):nn