Chapter 3: FRBR Implementations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5860/ltr.42n6Abstract
“FRBR, FRAR, FROR, FRVRR, FRANAR, FRSAR … What are these abbreviations? In a profession that lives and breathes abbreviations and acronyms, do we really need more? Apparently we do, because these are the new boys (or girls) on the block. There is an information revolution on the horizon. Actually, it is going on right now. Libraries no longer have a monopoly on information. As library professionals, we are challenged by publicly traded companies—such as Google and Amazon—with billions of dollars in resources. They provide the consumer with easy-to-use Web interfaces, a single-search box that belies the complexity of indexes and programming beneath, and add-on features that have become extremely popular with users who now expect them to be available on the library's online public access catalog (OPAC) and databases.
“It has become apparent to library administrators the current organizational arrangement and division of operations of technical services and public services is not sustainable either financially or organizationally. The clear imperative is: libraries need to be able to morph, change, reengineer, and strategically invest and train personnel and resources toward a future in which information is no longer controlled or held by the library, but by a large number of publishing and service conglomerates for whom there is little incentive to think about issues, such as persistent access, preservation, or standardization of digital objects….
“We have neither the money nor the market dominance that companies like Google, Amazon, and eBay have in the new information environment; we must change, and we must change NOW! FRBR and its subsequent follower abbreviations and/or acronyms may be able to provide the marketability and viability towards this new direction. Only time will tell.”
Brad Eden is Associate University Librarian for Technical Services and Scholarly Communication at the University of California, Santa Barbara. Previous positions include Head, Web and Digitization Services for the University of Nevada, Las Vegas Libraries; Head, Bibliographic and Metadata Services for the UNLV Libraries; and Coordinator of Technical Services for the North Harris Montgomery Community College District. He is editor of OCLC Systems & Services: Digital Library Perspectives International and is associate editor of Library Hi Tech and The Journal of Film Music . He has a master's and Ph.D. degrees in musicology as well as an MS in library science. He publishes in the areas of metadata, librarianship, medieval music and liturgy, and J. R. R. Tolkien. He recently edited Innovative Redesign and Reorganization of Library Technical Services: Paths for the Future and Case Studies (Libraries Unlimited, 2004), and is the author of four other issues of Library Technology Reports including, “Metadata and Its Applications: New Directions and Updates” (41:6); “Innovative Digital Projects in the Humanities” (41:4); “3D Visualization Techniques: 2D and 3D Information Visualization Resources, Application, and Future” (41:1); and “Metadata and Its Applications” (38:5).”
References
James Gordon, M.D., “Quotations by Author,” The Quotations Page, www.quotationspage.com/quotes/James_GordonnCarol Hetherington, “Setting the Record Straight: Bibliography and Australian Literature,”
Australian Literature Studies
, no. 2 (2003): 198–208, www.austlit.edu.au:7777/presentations/SettingRecordStraightCH.docnPatrick Le Bœuf, ed.,
Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR): Hype, or Cure-All?
(Binghamton: Haworth Press, 2005). Also appeared as an article in
Cataloging & Classification Quarterly
, no. 3–4, www.catalogingandclassificationquarterly.com/ccq39nr3-4.htmlnPortia VisualCat information from Portia I/S, a provider of “cost-effective IT solutions and consulting services to international customers in the private sector and public administration,” www.portia.dk/websites/aboutus.htmnPoul Henrik Jorgensen, “Practical Application of FRBR and RDF,” one-page description of “how IFLA FRBR in combination with the [World Wide Web Consortium] is used by the VisualCat System for Cataloguing, Authority Control, and Searching across different materials,” no.d., http://w3.uniroma1.it/ssab/er/relazioni/jorgensen_eng.pdfnInformation from VTLS, Inc., Virtua product page on VTLS Web site, www.vtls.com/Products/virtua.shtmlnCraig K. Thomas, “Does FRBR Include Serials? A FRBR Implementation for All Formats,” NASIG Newsletter 20, no. 3 (September 2005), www.nasig.org/newsletters/newsletters.2005/05sept/05sept_other_serials_news.htmlnInformation from VTLS, Inc., January 7, 2004, www.vtls.com/Corporate/Releases/2004/6.shtmlnInformation from RedLightGreen Web site (www.redlightgreen.comnGary Price, “Searching for Library Books with RedLightGreen,” SearchEngineWatch (October 31, 2005), http://searchenginewatch.com/showPage.html?page=3560121nMerrilee Proffitt, “RedLightGreen: How to Google Your Library Catalog,” NLA News 15, no. 4 (January 2005), www.nla.gov.au/pub/nlanews/2005/jan05/article1.htmlnMonte Sano Associates, “FRBR Floater: Easy Online Access to Title with Multiple Editions and Formats,” no.d., www.montesanoassociates.com/downloads/FRBRFloater.pdfnPatrick Le Bœuf, ed., Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR): Hype, or Cure-All? (Binghamton: Haworth Press, 2005). Also appeared as an article in Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 39, no. 3–4, www.catalogingandclassificationquarterly.com/ccq39nr3-4.htmlnSheau-Hwang Change, '“FRBR and FRBRization,”' OCLC Systems & Services 18 no. 4 (2002):nThomas B. Hickey, Edward T. O'Neill, and Jenny Toves,“Experiments with the IFLA Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR),”
D-Lib Magazine
, no. 9 (September 2002), www.dlib.org/dlib/september02/hickey/09hickey.htmlnPatrick Le Bœuf, ed.,
Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR): Hype, or Cure-All?
(Binghamton: Haworth Press, 2005). Also appeared as an article in
Cataloging & Classification Quarterly
, no. 3–4, www.catalogingandclassificationquarterly.com/ccq39nr3-4.htmlnEdward T. O'Neill, “FRBR (Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records): Application of the Entity-Relationship Model to
Humphry Clinker,” Library Resources & Technical Services (LRTS)
, no. 4 (2002): 150–59, e-version available at www.oclc.org/research/publications/archive/2002/oneill_frbr22.pdfn“ FRBR Bookmarklets: A Way to Weave Your Library's Collection into Web Bookstores,”
OCLC Newsletter
(January/February/March 2004), www.oclc.org/news/pub-lications/newsletters/oclc/2004/263/bookmarklets.htmlnBCR Online, “OCLC Research's Experimental ISBN/FRBR Project,”
The Third Indicator
, no. 2 (February 2004), www.bcr.org/publications/thirdind/2004/february/febcatisbn04.htmlnRoy Tennant, “Not Your Mother's Union Catalog,”
Library Journal
(April 15, 2003), www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA289190.htmlnPatrick Le Bœuf, ed.,
Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR): Hype, or Cure-All?
(Binghamton: Haworth Press, 2005). Also appeared as an article in Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 39, no. 3–4, www.catalogingandclassificationquarterly.com/ccq39nr3-4.htmlnCarol van Nuys, “The Paradigma Project,”
RLG News
, no. 2 (April 15, 2003), www.rlg.org/preserv/diginews/diginews7-2.html#feature2nPatrick Le Bœuf, ed.,
Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR): Hype, or Cure-All?
(Binghamton: Haworth Press, 2005). Also appeared as an article in Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 39, no. 3–4, www.catalogingandclassificationquarterly.com/ccq39nr3-4.htmlnIbid.n