Chapter 4: Conclusion
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5860/ltr.49n7Abstract
This final chapter of Library Technology Reports (vol. 49, no. 7) “Technological Innovation: Perceptions and Definitions” provides additional analysis of the survey results shared in the previous chapter. While innovation is often portrayed in a positive light as the pathway to progress and development, engendering a culture of innovation and actual implementation of “innovative” ideas can be challenging. Note is made of a few of these challenges and the importance of clear focus and objectives. The chapter concludes with a few technological items that may someday—sooner or later—make their way into society and libraries.
References
Char Booth, Informing Innovation: Tracking Student Interest in Emerging Library Technologies at Ohio University (Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries 2009): 7-nR C Jantz, '“A Framework for Studying Organizational Innovation in Research Libraries, ”' College & Research Libraries 73 6 (): 525 November 2012nEverett M Rogers, Diffusion of Innovations (New York: Free Press 2003): 137-nNote: One of the twenty-four survey respondents chose not to answer this question, question 6nNote: Most respondents provided ratings for all the items, though a few respondents chose not to rate the occasional item. Overall, out of 736 possible provided ratings (23 participating respondents, 32 items to rate each), there were only 20 instances (2.7 percent) where a rating was not providednBen McNeely, Diana G Oblinger Ed., James L Oblinger Ed., '“Using Technology as a Learning Tool, Not Just the Cool New Thing, ”' Educating the Net Generation (Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE 2005): 4.9-4.10 nChar Booth, 'Informing Innovation: Tracking Student Interest in Emerging Library Technologies at Ohio University' (Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries 2009): 1-nIbid., 15nJ James Wagner, Diana G Oblinger Ed., James L Oblinger Ed., '“Support Services for the Net Generation, ”' Educating the Net Generation (Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE 2005): 10.1- nIbid., 10.4nDerek Rodriguez, Beth Ellington, Barbara Wildemuth, Gary Marchionini Ed., Barbara Moran Ed., '“Information Professionals 2050—Industry Panel, ”' Information Professionals 2050: Educational Possibilities and Pathways (Chapel Hill: UNC-CH School of Information and Library Science 2012): 101- nKathryn Deiss, '“Innovation and Strategy: Risk and Choice in Shaping User-Centered Libraries, ”' Library Trends 53 1 (): 23-24 Summer 2004nLorcan Dempsey, Gary Marchionini Ed., Barbara Moran Ed., '“Libraries and the Informational Future: Some Notes, ”' Information Professionals 2050: Educational Possibilities and Pathways (Chapel Hill: UNC-CH School of Information and Library Science 2012): 114- nIbid., 123nHeena Ko Ed., Jacky Myint Ed., Sara Cwynar Ed., Samantha Henig Ed., '“32 Innovations That Will Change Your Tomorrow, ”' New York Times (): June 1, 2012, www.nytimes.com/interactive/2012/06/03/magazine/innovations-issue.html?_r=0nMichael Eisenberg, Sean Fullerton, Gary Marchionini Ed., Barbara Moran Ed., '“ED and INFO 2052: Oh, the Places You’ll Go, ”' Information Professionals 2050: Educational Possibilities and Pathways (Chapel Hill: UNC-CH School of Information and Library Science 2012): 11-12 n'“NC State Unveils Hi-Tech Library, ”' Elaina Athans (reporter) (): April 3, 2013, http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/video?id=9051966n'“The Harvard Library Innovation Laboratory: FAQ, ”' Harvard Law School (): accessed May 18, 2013, http://librarylab.law.harvard.edu/faqnM Clayton Christensen, B MichaelHorn, Curtis W Johnson, 'Disrupting Class: How Disruptive Innovation Will Change the Way the World Learns' (New York: McGraw-Hill 2008) cited in Eisenberg and Fullerton, “ED and INFO 2052” 4n
