Shall We Get Rid of the Reference Desk?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5860/rusq.52n4.320Abstract
This study examines the prevalence of offering reference services from the reference desk in 119 academic libraries at universities offering master’s level programs. Survey results found that 66.4 percent of libraries still used the reference desk to offer reference services, and 77.21 percent of libraries use a professional librarian at the reference desk all or some of the time.
References
S Rothstein, ():
The Development of Reference Services through Academic traditions, Public Library Practice and Special Librarianship
(Chicago: Association of College and Reference Libraries, 1955), ACRL Monographs Number 14, 6–21nF Crunden, '“Report on Aids and Guides, August ’83 to June ’85, ”
Library Journal
(Milwaukee Conference Number) 10: 310, as found in S. Rothstein, “The Development of the Concept of Reference Service in American Libraries, 1850–1900, ”' The Library Quarterly 23 1 (): 1-15nBarbara J Ford, '“Reference Beyond (and Without) the Reference Desk”' College & Research Libraries 47 no. 5 (September 1986): 492-94nKeith Ewing and Robert Hauptman, “Is Traditional Reference Service Obsolete?”
Journal of Academic Librarianship
no. 1 (1995) 3–6; David W Lewis, “Traditional Reference Is Dead, Now Let’s Move on to Important Questions, ”
Journal of Academic Librarianship
no. 1 (1995) 10–12; Jerry. D Campell, “Shaking the Conceptual Foundations of Reference: A Perspective, ”
Reference Services Review
, no. 4(1992): 31, 33–35; Jerry. D Campbell, “Still Shaking the Conceptual Foundations of Reference: A Perspective, ”
Reference Librarian
, no. 2 (2007): 22; Gabriela Sonntag and Felicia Palsson “No Longer the Sacred Cow—No Longer a Desk: Transforming Reference Service to Meet 21st Century User Needs, ”
Library Philosophy and Practice
(2007), www.webpages.uidaho.edu/∼mbolin/sonntag-palsson.htmnBell Steven. J, '“Who Needs a Reference Desk?”' Library Issues: Briefings for Faculty and Administrators 27 no. 6 (July 2007): 1n'“The High Cost of Reference: The Need to Reassess Services and Service Delivery, ”' The Reference Librarian no. 43 (1994): 78nIbid., 79n'“The Future of Reference: Point-of-Need Reference Service: No Longer an Afterthought, ”' Reference Services Review 31 no. 1 (2003): 31nAaron Schmidt, '“Revamping Reference, ”' Library Journal 136 no. 8 (May 1, 2011): 18nC EdwardJestes, David Laird, '“A Time Study of General Reference Work in a University Library,”' Research in Librarianship 2 (1968): 16nRao Aluri and Jeffrey W. St. Clair, “Academic Reference Librarians: An Endangered Species?” Journal of Academic Librarianship 4, no. 2 (May 1978): 82; Thelma Freides, “
Current Trends in Academic Libraries
, ” Library Trends 31, no. 3 (Winter 1983): 467; Virginia Massey-Burzio, “Reference Encounters of a Different Kind: A Symposium”
Journal of Academic Librarianship
, no 5 (1992): 277; Allison I. Faixet al., “Peer Reference Redefined: New Uses for Undergraduate Students, ”
Reference Services Review
, no. 1(2010): 90, 103. This study conducted at Costal Carolina University in 2009 found that upper-level undergraduate students can provide excellent reference service with proper training and guidance from librarians. Also Debbi Dinkins and Susan M. Ryan, “Measuring Referrals: The Use of Paraprofessionals at the Reference Desk, ”
Journal of Academic Librarianship
, no 4. (July 2010): 283. This study at Stetson University found that the nonprofessional, with training and experience, could answer 78 percent of the reference questions without a librarian assisting him in the fall 2008 semester. By the spring 2009 semester, the number of questions answered (unaided by the librarian) by the nonprofessional that were considered reference questions rose to 95 percentnS. M Ryan, '“Reference Transactions Analysis: The Cost-Effectiveness of Staffing a Traditional Academic Reference Desk, ”' Journal of Academic Librarianship 34 5 (): 389-99nDavid A Tyckoson, '“What Is the Best Model of Reference Service?”' Library Trends 50 no.2 (Fall 2001): 192-93nAmerican Library Association,
Academic Libraries in the United States—Statistical Trends
, accessed Sept. 22, 2012, www.ala.org/ala/research/librarystats/academic/academiclibraries.cfmnPerceptions of Libraries, 2010: Context and Community: A Report to the OCLC Membership
(Dublin, OH: OCLC Online Computer Library Center, 2011), 54, accessed Jan. 29, 2011, www.oclc.org/reports/2010perceptions.htmnMichael Gorman, '“Values for Human-to-Human Reference, ”' Library Trends 50 no. 2 (Fall 2001): 171-72 182nKaren Sobel, '“Promoting Library Reference Services to First-Year Undergraduate Students: What Works?”' Reference & User Services Quarterly 48 no. 4 (Summer 2009): 362nRebekah Kilzer, '“Reference as Service, Reference as Place: A View of Reference in the Academic Library, ”' Reference Librarian 52 no 4 (Oct.–Dec. 2011): 291-99nDavid S Nolen, '“Reforming or Rejecting the Reference Desk: Conflict and Continuity in the Concept of Reference, ”
Library Philosophy and Practice
' 12 no. 2 (Fall 2010): 1-12nAdeane Bregman and Barbara Mento, “Reference Roving at Boston College, ”
College & Research Libraries News
. 53, no. 10(November 1992): 634–37; Eileen H. Kramer, “Why Roving Reference: A Case Study in a Small Academic Library, ”
Reference Services Review
, no. 3 (Fall 1996): 67–80; Terence. K. Huwe, “Casting a Wider Net with Roving Reference, ”
Computers in Libraries
, no 3 (March 2003): 34–36; Kathryn Robinson, “Point-of-Need Customer Service: Mobile Service Using Wireless Technology, ”
Journal of Access Services
, no 2 (2005): 1–14; Megan Lotts and Stephanie Graves, “Using the iPad for Reference Services: Librarians Go Mobile, ”
College and Research Libraries News
, no. 4 (May 2011): 217–20nSandra Wong and Anne O’Shea, “Librarians Have Left the Building: Ask Use HERE! At Simon Fraser University, ”
Feliciter
, no. 3 (2004): 90–92; Molly Strothmann and Karen Antell, “The Live-In Librarian: Developing Library Outreach to University Residence Halls, ”
Reference & User Services Quarterly
, no. 1(Fall 2010): 48–58; Triveni Kuchi, Laura Bowering Mullen, and Stephanie Tama-Bartels, “Librarians Without Borders: Reaching Out to Students at a Campus Center, ”
Reference & User Services Quarterly
, no. 4 (Summer 2004): 310–17nD CrystalGale, Betty S Evans, '“Face-to-Face: The Implementation and Analysis of a Research Consultation Service, ” College and Undergraduate Libraries 14, no 3. (2007): 85–101; Theresa. S. Arndt, “Reference Service Without the Desk, ”
Reference Services Review
' 38 no. 1 (2010): 71-80nJoyce A. Meldrem, Lori A. Mardis, and Carolyn Johnson, “Redesign Your Reference Desk: Get Rid of It!”
Currents and Convergence: Navigating the Rivers of Change Proceedings of the Twelfth National Conference of the Association of College and Research Libraries
, April 7–10, 2005, ed. Hugh A. Thompson (Chicago, Association of College and Research Libraries, 2005), 305, 307–08nPatricia H Dawson, '“Are Science, Engineering, and Medical Libraries Moving away from the Reference Desk? Results of a Survey of New Jersey Libraries, ”
Science & Technology Libraries
' 30 no. 4 (2011): 343-53nMarlys Brunsting, '“Reference Staffing: Common Practices of medium-Sized Academic Libraries, ”
Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Electronic Reserve
' 18 no. 2 (2008): 157-58nJ Steven, 'Bell, “Who Needs a Reference Desk?”' Library Issues: Briefings for Faculty and Administrators 27 no. 6 (July 2007): 1-4nThe 2008 survey revealed 65.82 percent of librarians surveyed indicated that they would never or probably not ever abandon the traditional reference model. The 2009 and 2010 surveys confirmed that still a majority of librarians were holding fast to the traditional model. However, problems with the 2010 survey design made the results unusable. In the 2010 survey, a question was asked the librarians to respond to the statement: Our library is using/will use the following types of reference. A list of several types of reference was given, including email, chat, text messaging, having students at the reference desk, traditional reference (defined as having a librarian at the desk) all hours the library is open, and traditional reference some hours that the library is open. The choices they had were we don’t want to do this, yes in the distant future (5 or more years), yes in the near future (1–4 years), and we are already doing this. The problem occurred when respondents answered the two traditional reference options. Many answered that they were doing both traditional reference all hours that the library was open and some hours that the library was open. Also there were discrepancies with the percentages between the above question and the question that asked how many hours do you offer each type of reference below. Since the percentages were not the same, the survey results were rejectednThe Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, The Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education: About Carnegie Classification, accessed March 9, 2012, http://classifications.carnegiefoundation.orgnThe Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. The Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education: Summary Table: Basic Classification, accessed March 9, 2012, http://classifications.carnegiefoundation.org/summary/basic.phpnThe Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, The Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education: Summary Table: Basic ClassificationnThese comments actually did not come from question 4 but from other questions in the survey. First, third, fourth, and fifth comments came from question 9. The second comment came from question 14. Even though these comments came from questions other than question 4, they seemed to fit at this point in the article. There may be other instances in subsequent questions where the comments quoted actually did not originate from the question being discussed, but they seemed to fit in that part of the discussionnAmerican Library Association, Guidelines for Behavioral Performance of Reference and Information Service Providers, www.ala.org/rusa/resources/guidelines/guidelinesbehavioralnAdeane Bregman, Barbara Mento, '“Reference Roving at Boston College, ”' College & Research Libraries News 53 no. 10 (November 1992): 634-37nJoyce A Meldrem, Lori A Mardis, Carolyn Johnson, “Redesign Your Reference Desk: Get Rid of It!” 305 (): 307-08nKaren Storin Summerhill, “The High Cost of Reference: The Need to Reassess Services and Service Delivery, ” 79; Theresa. S. Arndt, “Reference Service Without the Desk, ” 7; Crystal D. Gale and Betty S. Evans, “Face-to-Face: The Implementation and Analysis of a Research Consultation Service, ” 85–101nWilliam, F. Heinlen, “Using Student Assistants in Academic Reference, ”
RQ
, no. 4 (Summer 1976) 323–25; Gabriela Sonntag and Felicia Palsson, ”No Longer the Sacred Cow—No Longer a Desk: Transforming Reference Service to Meet 21st Century User Needs, ”
Library Philosophy and Practice
(February 2007), accessed March 8, 2012, www.webpages.uidaho.edu/∼mbolin/sonntag-palsson.pdfnAmerican Library Association, Definitions of Reference, 2008, accessed January 14, 2013, www.ala.org/rusa/resources/guidelines/definitionsofreferencen
