Beyond the Search Box
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5860/rusq.51n3.235Abstract
New unified discovery tools are designed to help students easily identify and retrieve library content. Students want quick and easy discovery of quality sources in a “Google-like” environment. Librarians have often expressed frustration with federated and metasearch systems that cannot take full advantage of discipline specific database features. As new options, such as discovery systems, become available, it remains to be seen if librarians have the same concerns about these new tools. What librarians want in these systems is less well explored than our users. At a local conference, the authors used a participatory design strategy to elicit from the participating librarians their views on what a discovery system should look like and function. Groups of participants drew their idea of what a discovery system should look like. An analysis of the findings reveals what librarians think are important features for these tools. The authors also discuss the use of the participatory design process.
References
John Boyd, '“The One-Box Challenge: Providing a Federated Search That Benefits the Research Process,”' Serials Review 32 (2006): 247-54nPaula J. Hanes, '“The Truth about Federated Searching,”' Information Today 20 no. 9 (2003): 24nLynn D. Lampert, Katherine S. Dabbour, '“Librarian Perspectives on Teaching Metasearch and Federated Search Technologies,”' Internet Reference Services Quarterly 12 (2007): 253-78nJason Vaughan, '“Dispatches from the Field: web-Scale Discovery,”' American Libraries 42 no. 1/2 (2011): 32nAnnie R. Armstrong, '“Student Perceptions of Federated Searching vs. Single Database Searching,”' Reference Services Review 37 (2009): 291-303nNina McHale, '“Why Reference Librarians and Instruction Librarians Hate Federated Searching and NextGen Catalogs,”' () online posting,
Web Services Librarian
blog, Jan. 9, 2009, n'“Librarian Perspectives,” 267; William J. Frost, “Do We Want or Need Metasearching?”' Library Journal 129 no. 6 (2004): 68nBoyd, '“The One-Box Challenge,”' : 250-nIbid., 252..nRong Tang, Ingrid Hsieh-Yee, Shanyun Zhang, '“User Perceptions of MetaLib Combined Search: An Investigation of How Users Make Sense of Federated Searching,”' Internet Reference Services Quarterly 12 (2007): 229-30nMcHale, '“Why Reference Librarians.”' ():n'“Librarian Perspectives,”' (): 263nT. D. Wilson, '“Human Information Behavior,”' Informing Science: Special Issue of Information Science Research (2000) (accessed May 21, 2011)..nWilson, '“Human Information Behavior.”' ():nMarcia Bates, '“The Design of Browsing and Berrypicking Techniques for the Online Search Interface,”' Online Review 13 no. 5 (1989): 407-24nBarbara M. Wildemuth, '“Evidence-based Practice in Search Interface Design,”' Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology 57 no. 6 (2006): 825-28nBarbara J. Cockrell, Elaine Anderson Jayne, '“How Do I Find and Article? Insights from a Web Usability Study,”' Journal of Academic Librarianship 28 no. 3 (2002): 122-32nIbid., 122.nJohn Ferrara, '“Search Behavior Patterns,”' Boxes and Arrows: The Design Behind the Design () (Jan. 30, 2008), nFerrara, '“Search Behavior Patterns.”' ():nKalbach, '“Designing for Information Foragers.”' ():nIbid.nDaniel E. Rose, '“Reconciling Information-Seeking Behavior with Search Interfaces for the Web,”' Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57 no. 6 (2006): 797-99nEliason, '“Navigating Online Menus,”' (): 509-16nPeter Morville, Jeffery Callender, Search Patterns (Sebastopol, Calif.: O-Reilly 2010)n Research-Based Web Design and Usability Guidelines () (accessed June 21, 2011).n '“User Interface Design Patterns for Search and Information Discovery”' Website: Thoughts on the Intersection of User Experience, Search, Text Analytics & More () (July 19, 2009), nMorville, Callender,
Search Patterns
, 95.nMorville, Callender,
Search Patterns
, 95.nMorville, Callender,
Search Patterns
, 68.nEliason, '“Navigating Online Menus,”' (): 509-16nMorville, Callender,
Search Patterns
, 97.nRose, '“Reconciling Information-Seeking Behavior with Search Interfaces for the Web,”' (): 797nFerrara, '“Search Behavior Patterns.”' ():nWildemuth, '“Evidence-based Practice in Search Interface Design,”' (): 826nDouglas Schuler, Aki Namioka, Participatory Design: Principles and Practices (Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum 1993)nLeanne Bowler, Sherry Koshman, Jung Sun Oh, Daqing He, Bernadette G. Callery, Geof Bowker, Richard J. Cox, '“Issues in User-Centered Design in LIS,”' Library Trends 59 (2011): 734nIbid.nClay Spinuzzi, B SusanJones Ed., Beth Weise Moeller Ed., Michael Priestley Ed., Bernadette Long Ed., '“Investigating the Technology-Work Relationship: A Critical Comparison of Three Qualitative Field Methods,”' IPCC/SIGDOC ’00 Proceedings of IEEE Professional Communication Society International Professional Communication Conference and Proceedings of the 18th Annual ACM International Conference on Computer Documentation: Technology & Teamwork (2000): 419-32nFinn Kensing, Jeanette Blomberg, '“Participatory Design: Issues and Concerns,”' Computer Supported Cooperative Work (1998) (accessed June 15, 2011).nNancy Fried Foster, Susan Gibbons, Studying Students: The Undergraduate Research Project at the University of Rochester (Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries 2007)n '“CLIR Workshops on Participatory Design in Academic Libraries”' () CLIR Activities, nLibraries have used participatory design and similar techniques for other purposes: MIT Libraries sought to understand how graduate and undergraduate students access information via a 2006 Photo Diary Study where students used cameras or took screenshots to capture their work processes.nFoster, Gibbons,
Studying Students
.nFoster, Dimmock, Bersani, '“Participatory Design of Websites.”' ():nIbid.n '“Take Control eXtensible Catalog,”' () (accessed Aug 1, 2011).nNancy Fried Foster, Scholarly Practice, Participatory Design and the eXtensible Catalog (Chicago: ALA 2011) vii, 18.nTatiana Nikolova-Houston, '“Using Participatory Design to Improve Web Sites,”' Computers in Libraries (2005) (accessed July 6, 2011).nIbid.nIbid.n'“Product Interface Design: A Participatory Approach Based on Virtual Reality,”' International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 68 no. 5 (2010): 254-69nHearst, '“Finding the Flow in Web Site Search,”' 47; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,
Research-Based Web Design and Usability Guidelines
, 182.nMorville, Callender,
Search Patterns
, 57.nLampert, Dabbour, '“Librarian Perspectives”' ():nMorville, Callendar,
Search Patterns
, 97.nIbid., 88.nIbid.nHearst, '“Finding the Flow in Web Site Search,”' (): 43nMoreville, Callender,
Search Patterns
, 72.nResearch-Based Web Design and Usability Guideline
, 64.nMoreville,
Search Patterns
, 112.nResearch-Based Web Design and Usability Guidelines
, 21.nMoreville, Callender,
Search Patterns
, 76.nResearch-Based Web Design and Usability Guidelines
, 11.nJung, '“LibraryFind,” 387' ():nCarl Grant, '“Beyond Federated Search—Winning the Battle and Losing the War?”' Federated Search Blog (Mar. 30, 2009) (accessed Feb. 14, 2011).n
