Finding Articles and Journals via Google Scholar, Journal Portals, and Link Resolvers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5860/rusq.50n2.170Abstract
Finding journal titles and journal articles are two of the toughest tasks on academic library webpages. Challenges include choosing the best tools, using terms that make sense, and guiding the user through the process. In addition, the continued development of Google Scholar raises the question of whether it could become a better tool for finding a full-text article than link resolver software or journal portals. To study these issues, researchers at James Madison University analyzed results from two usability tests. One usability test focused on the library homepage navigation and had two tasks related to finding articles by citation and journals by title. The other test asked participants to find citations in three web interfaces: the library’s journal portal, Google Scholar, and the library’s link resolver form. Both usability studies revealed challenges with finding journal titles and journal articles. The latter study showed Google Scholar provided more effective user performance and user satisfaction than either the journal portal or the link resolver form. Based on the findings from the two usability studies, specific changes were made to the library webpages and to several library systems, including the catalog and link resolver form.
References
Galina Letnikova, 'Developing a Standardized List of Questions for the Usability Testing of an Academic Library Web Site' Journal of Web Librarianship 2 2 (2008): 381-415nMarshall Breeding, 'Next-Generation Library Catalogs' Library Technology Reports 43 4 (2007): Susan Marcin and Peter Morris, “OPAC: The Next Generation: Placing an Encore Front End onto a SirsiDynix ILS,”
Computers in Libraries
, no. 5(May 2008): 6–9, 62, 64nJeffrey Rubin, Dana Chisnell, Handbook of Usability Testing: How to Plan, Design, and Conduct Effective Tests (Indianapolis, Ind.: Wiley 2008) Joseph S. Dumas and Janice Redish
A Practical Guide to Usability Testing
, rev. ed. (Exeter, England, and Portland, Ore.: Intellect, 1999)nBob Bailey, “Users are Not Good Designers,” www.usability.gov/pubs/032005news.htmlnNicole Campbell, Usability Assessment of Library-Related Web Sites: Methods and Case Studies (Chicago: Library and Information Technology Association 2001) Elaina Norlin and C. M. Winters
Usability Testing for Library Web Sites: A Hands-In Guide
(Chicago: ALA, 2002)nLetnikova, “Developing a Standardized List.”nJakob Nielsen, “Why You Only Need to Test with 5 Users,” www.useit.com/alertbox/20000319.htmlnJakob Nielsen, “Quantitative Studies: How Many Users to Test?” www.useit.com/alertbox/quantitative_testing.htmlnCarol C. Kuhlthau, 'Inside the Search Process: Information Seeking from the User’s Perspective' Journal for the American Society for Information Science 42 5 (1991): 361-71nKalervo Järvelin, Peter Ingwersen, 'Information Seeking Research Needs Extension Toward Tasks and Technology' Information Research 10 1 (2004): (accessed June 16, 2010)http://informationr.net/ir/10–1/paper212.htmlnFrederick G. Kilgour, 'Effectiveness of Surname-Title-Words Searches by Scholars' Journal of the American Society for Information Science 46 no. 2 (1995): 146-51 Frederick G. Kilgour and Barbara B. Moran. “Retrieval Effectiveness of Surname-Title-Word Searches for Known Items by Academic Library Users,”
Journal of the American Society for Information Science
, no. 3 (1999): 265–70; Min-Yen Kan and Danny C.C. Poo, “Detecting and Supporting Known Item Queries in Online Public Access Catalogs,”
JCDL
, June 7–11, 2005, Denver, Colo., 91–99nGary Marchionini, 'Exploratory Search: From Finding to Understanding' Communications of the ACM 49 4 (2006): 42nPascal Lupien, Lorna Evelyn Rourke, 'Out of the Question!… How We Are Using Our Students’ Virtual Reference Questions to Add a Personal Touch to a Virtual World' Evidence Based Library and Information Practice 2 2 (2007): 67-80 Barbara J. Cockrell and Elaine Anderson Jayne, “How do I Find an Article? Insights from a Web Usability Study,”
Journal of Academic Librarianship
, no. 3(May 2002): 122–32nBurton Callicott, Debbie Vaughn, 'Google Scholar vs. Library Scholar: Testing the Performance of Schoogle' Internet Reference Services Quarterly 10 3 (2006): 71-88 Brenda Battleson, Austin Booth, and Jane Weintrop, “Usability Testing of an Academic Library Web Site: A Case Study,”
Journal of Academic Librarianship
, no. 3(2001): 188–98; Susan H. Mvungi, Karin de Jager, and Peter G. Underwood, “An Evaluation of the Information Architecture of the UCT Library Web Site,”
South African Journal of Library & Information Science
, no. 2 (2008): 171–82; Michael Whang and Donna M. Ring, “A Student-Focused Usability Study of the Western Michigan University Libraries Home Page,”
Journal of Web Librarianship
, no. 3 (2007): 67–88; Tom Ipri, Michael Yunkin, and Jeanne M. Brown, “Usability as a Method for Assessing Discovery,”
Information Technology & Libraries
, no. 4 (2009): 181–83nLetnikova, “Developing a Standardized List.”nIpri, Yunkin, and Brown, “Usability as a Method.”nMvungi, de Jager, and Underwood, “An Evaluation of the Information.”nWhang and Ring, “A Student-Focused Usability Study.”nMarie T. Ascher, Haldor Lougee-Heimer, Diana J. Cunningham, 'Approaching Usability: A Study of an Academic Health Sciences Library Web Site' Medical Reference Services Quarterly 26 2 (2007): 37-53nCockrell and Jayne, “How Do I Find an Article?”nJohn Kupersmith, “Library Terms Evaluated in Usability Tests and Other Studies,” www.jkup.net/terms-studies.htmlnNina McHale, 'Toward a User-Centered Academic Library Home Page' Journal of Web Librarianship 2 2 (2008): 139-76nTerry W. Brandsma, Elizabeth R. Bernhardt, Dana M. Sally, 'Journal Finder, a Second Look: Implications for Serials Access in Today’s Library' Serials Review 29 4 (2003): 287-95nEllington Beth, 'The Usability of the Journal Finder Interface' Journal of Web Librarianship 2 2 (2008): 307-37nShobana Jayaraman, Karen Harker, 'Evaluating the Quality of a Link Resolver' Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries 6 2 (2009): 152-62nCallicott and Vaughn, “Google Scholar vs. Library Scholar,” 71–88.nHur-Li Lee, 'Information Structures and Undergraduate Students' Journal of Academic Librarianship 34 3 (2008): 211-19nRebecca Donlan, Rachel Cooke, 'Running with the Devil: Accessing Library-Licensed Full Text Holdings through Google Scholar' Internet Reference Services Quarterly 10 3/4 (2005): 149-57nIbid.nJohn Brooke, P. W. Jordan Ed., 'SUS: A ‘Quick and Dirty’ Usability Scale' Usability Evaluation in Industry (London: Taylor and Francis 1996) , accessed Oct. 27, 2009)nNielsen, “Quantitative Studies: How Many Users to Test?”nChristopher D. Manning, Prabhakar Raghavan, Hinrich Schütze, An Introduction to Information Retrieval (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Pr. 2008)nKuhlthau, “Inside the Search Process”; Järvelin and Ingwersen, “Information Seeking Research.”nLetnikova, “Developing a Standardized List.”nMarchionini, “Exploratory Search.”nMvungi, de Jager, and Underwood, “An Evolution of the Information.”nChris Neuhaus, Ellen Neuhaus, Alan Asher, 'Google Scholar Goes to School: The Presence of Google Scholar on College and University Web Sites' Journal of Academic Librarianship 34 1 (2008): 39-51nIpri, Yunkin, and Brown, “Usability as a Method.”nMvungi, de Jager, and Underwood, “An Evaluation of the Information.”nDonald O. Case, Karen E. Fisher Ed., Sanda Erdelez Ed., Lynne McKechnie Ed., 'Principle of Least Effort' Theories of Information Behavior (Medford N.J: Information Today 2005): 289-92n
