Wikipedia: Librarians’ Perspectives on Its Use as a Reference Source
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5860/rusq.53n2.155Abstract
Mention Wikipedia in a group of people and a lively discussion is sure to follow with terms such as peer-review, editing policies, and Web 2.0 entering the conversation. Wikipedia is the open access, Web 2.0 encyclopedia that is harnessing the power (and knowledge) of the masses and making it freely available to the Internet audience. With open access, problems have appeared and solutions have been implemented; however, many netizens (network citizens) are only aware of the negative and high profile misuses of Wikipedia, skewing their view of this knowledge repository. This paper studies how one group of information seekers, librarians, is utilizing this freely accessible web resource in their work, and how positive and negative awareness affects this usage. Usage statistics, awareness statistics, and gender differences for Wikipedia usage are presented in this paper and discussed. Comparisons of librarian statistics to previously published data on university faculty and student usage of Wikipedia are presented. It is established that librarians have greater awareness of negative issues surrounding Wikipedia than of positive issues. This awareness drives usage of Wikipedia in personal and professional settings. Results also indicate that there are no major gender differences in awareness of positive and negative issues concerning Wikipedia, but that males tend to use Wikipedia more than females, confirming the results of previous studies.
References
() Alexa, “Global Top Ten,” accessed August 2, 2011, nJohnny Snyder, '“Wikipedia as an Academic Reference: Faculty and Student Viewpoints” in
Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems, Lima, Peru
' (2010) .nJack Maness, '“Library 2.0 Theory: Web 2.0 and Its Implications for Libraries,”' Webology 3 2 (2006): 1-9nIbid., 5nPnina Shachaf, '“The Paradox of Expertise: Is the Wikipedia Reference Desk as Good as Your Library?”' Journal of Documentation 65 6 (2009): 977-96nIbid., 987nIbid., 990nTheresa Anderson, '“Information, Media, Digital Industries and the Library and Information Science Curriculum,”' Information Research 12 4 (2007): accessed August 5, 2011, http://InformationR.net/ir/12–4/colis/colise04.htmlnJohn East, '“The Rolls Royce of the Library Reference Collection: The Subject Encyclopedia in the Age of Wikipedia,”' Reference & Users Services Quarterly 50, no 2 (2010): 162-69nIbidnKathy West, Janet Williamson, '“Wikipedia: Friend or Foe?”' Reference Services Review 37 (2009): 269-70nMichael Stephens, '“Exploring Web 2.0 and Libraries,”' Library Technology Reports 42 4 (2006): 8-14nAngela Rand, '“Mediating at the Student–Wikipedia Intersection,”' Journal of Library Administration 50 7–8 (2010): 923-32nJohnny Snyder, '“Wikipedia as an Academic Reference: Faculty and Student Viewpoints” in
Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems, Lima, Peru
' (2010):nDiane Murley, '“In defense of Wikipedia,”' Law Library Journal 100 3 (2008): 593-607nTony Stankus, Sarah Spiegel, '“Wikipedia, Scholarpedia, and References to Books in the Brain and Behavioral Sciences: A Comparison of Cited Sources and Recommended Readings in Matching Free Online Encyclopedia Entries,”' Science & Technology Libraries 29 2010 (): 144-64nIbid., 145nJim Giles, '“Internet Encyclopaedias Go Head To Head,”' Nature 438 (2005): 900-901 Stankus and Spiegel, “Wikipedia,” 146n () Scholarpedia, “SPStatistics,” accessed August 5, 2011, nPhilip Schreur, '“The Academy Unbound—Linked Data as Revolution,”' Library Resources & Technical Services 56 4 (2012): 227-37nSook Lim, Nahyun Kwon, '“Gender Differences in Information Behavior Concerning Wikipedia, an Unorthodox Information Source?”' Library & Information Science Research 32 (2010): 212-20nVivienne Waller, '“The Search Queries that Took Australian Internet Users to Wikipedia,”' Information Research 16 2 (2011): 1-19nIbidnAndy Field, 'Discovering Statistics Using SPSS' (Los Angeles: Sage 2009)nBrendan Luyt, Yasmin Ally, Nur Low, Norah Ismail, '“Librarian Perception of Wikipedia: Threats or Opportunities for Librarianship?”' International Journal of Libraries & Information Services 60 (2010): 57-64nIbidnBrendan Luyt, Chia Zainal, Olivia Mayo, Tan Yun, '“Young People’s Perceptions and Usage of Wikipedia,”' Information Research 13 4 (2008): 1-11nCompete.com, personal email to author, July 21, 2010nField, Discovering Statistics Using SPSS, 57nAndrew LaVallee, '“Only 13 Percent of Wikipedia Contributors are Women Study Says,”' Wall Street Journal (): August 31, 2009, accessed August 15, 2011, http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2009/08/31/onlynJohnny Snyder, '“Wikipedia as an Academic Reference: Faculty and Student Viewpoints” in
Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems, Lima, Peru
' (2010):nEricka Menchen-Trevino, Eszter Hargittai, '“Young Adults’ Credibility Assessment of Wikipedia,”' Information, Communication & Society 14 1 (2011): 24-51nJack Maness, '“Library 2.0 Theory: Web 2.0 and Its Implications for Libraries,”' Webology 3 2 (2006): 1-9n
