Self-Service Holds in Libraries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5860/rusq.52n1.33Abstract
The increased use of self service holds, a holds system where a patron is notified that a requested book has arrived and the patron retrieves it from a publicly accessible holds shelf without assistance from library staff, raises new questions about user privacy. In response to concerns about possible violations of patron confidentiality with this practice, in 2011 ALA passed a Resolution to Protect Library User Confidentiality in Self-Service Hold Practices . Michigan libraries were surveyed to determine the number that use self-service holds; why or why not they choose to implement them, and, if they did, what methods they used to protect the privacy of their patrons. The results show that between 15% and 27% of Michigan libraries currently use self-service holds and more libraries plan to implement them in the future. The survey responses suggest that methods employed to protect patron privacy are not sustainable, not cost effective, or simply not effective. The identity of the requesting patron of 85% of the items placed on self-service holds shelves in responding libraries can still be discerned by other patrons.
References
Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism
(“USA PATRIOT Act”) Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-56, 115 Stat. 272 (2001).n 'Office of Intellectual Freedom, Resolution to Protect Library User Confidentiality in Self-Service Hold Practices (Chicago: ALA, 2011)' () .nIbid., para. 9 & 10.nIbid., para. 14.nNancy Fried Foster Ed., Susan Gibbons Ed., ()
Studying Students: The Undergraduate Research Project at the University of Rochester
(Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries, 2007), nAnne Klinefelter, '“Privacy and Library Public Services: Or, I Know What You Read Last Summer, ”' Legal Reference Services Quarterly 26 no. 1/2 (2007): 253-79nKate Burlette, '“It’s a Balancing Act, ”' Public Libraries 47 no. 5 (2008): 74-75nKlinefelter, “Privacy and Library Public Services.”nEric Robertson, '“A Fundamental Right to Read: Reader Privacy Protections in the U.S. Constitution, ”' University of Colorado Law Review 82 no. 1 (2011): 307-30nLee Ann Torrans, '
Law and Libraries: The Public Library
(Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited, 2004): 35; Bruce M. Kennedy, “Confidentiality of Library Records: A Survey of Problems, Policies, and Laws' Law Library Journal 81 no. 4 (1989): 733-67nStacey L Bowers, '“Privacy and Library Records, ”' Journal of Academic Librarianship 32 no. 4 (2006): 377-83nMich. Comp. Laws
§ 397.603 (West 2012).nIbid., § 397.602(i).nBowers, “Privacy and Library Records.”nUSA PATRIOT Act
.nFamily Educational Rights and Privacy Act
, 20 U.S.C. § 1232g; 34 CFR Part 99.nHelen R. Adams et al., Privacy in the 21st Century: Issues for Public, School, and Academic Libraries (Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited, 2005), 105.nStacey L Bowers, '“Self-Service Holds: A Violation of Library Patrons’ Privacy, ”' Public Libraries 47 no. 4 (2008): 54-57nTheresa Chmara, Privacy and Confidentiality Issues: A Guide for Libraries and Their Lawyers
(Chicago: American Library Association, 2009), 69–70.nSee, for example, Bowers, “Privacy and Library Records”; Klinefelter, “Privacy and Library Public Services.”.nAdams et al.,
Privacy in the 21st Century; Chmara, Privacy and Confidentiality Issues
.nTrina J Magi, '“Fourteen Reasons Privacy Matters: A Multidisciplinary Review of Scholarly Literature, ”' Library Quarterly 81 no. 2 (2011): 187-209nTrina J Magi, '“The Gap between Theory and Practice: A Study of the Prevalence and Strength of Patron Confidentiality Policies in Public and Academic Libraries, ”' Library & Information Science Research 29 no. 4 (2007): 455-70nTessie Schepman, '“Anonymity of Library Users in The Netherlands and Croatia, ”' New Library World 109 no. 9/10 (2008): 407-18nPaul Sturges, '“User Privacy in the Digital Library Environment: An Investigation of Policies and Preparedness, ”' Library Management 24 no. 1/2 (2003): 44-50nPnina Shachaf, '“A Global Perspective on Library Association Codes of Ethics, ”' Library & Information Science Research 27 no. 4 (2005): 513-33nSturges et al. “User Privacy in the Digital Library Environment.”nLisa Sutlieff, Jackie Chelin, '“‘An Absolute Prerequisite’: The Importance of User Privacy and Trust in Maintaining Academic Freedom at the Library, ”' Journal of Librarianship & Information Science 42 no. 3 (2010): 163-77nTrina Magi, '“A Study of US Library Directors’ Confidence and Practice Regarding Patron Confidentiality, ”' Library Management 29 no. 8/9 (2008): 746-56n Interactive Library Directory (2011) .nJ Richard Landis, Gary G Koch, '“The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data, ”' Biometrics 33 no. 1 (1977): 159-74nCandace Williams, '“Dearborn Library Branch Closes; More Cuts Possible: Millage Sought to Ease Budget Pressures at Time When Demand for Service is Rising, ”' Detroit News (Sept. 3, 2011): A4nChristie P.
Brandau Michigan Public Library Trustee Manual
(Lansing: Library of Michigan, 2004), http://michigan.gov/documents/hal_lm_trusteemanual2004_107173_7.pdfnKlinefelter, “Privacy and Library Public Services, ” 263.nKlinefelter, “Privacy and Library Public Services.”nIbid., 271.nSturges et al. “
User Privacy in the Digital Library Environment.
”nAmerican Library Association,
Guidelines for Developing a Library Privacy Policy
(Chicago: ALA, 2007), www.ala.org/offices/oif/iftoolkits/toolkitsprivacy/guidelinesfordevelopingalibraryprivacypolicy/guidelinesprivacypolicyn
