Typology of Ambiguity on Representation of Information Needs

This research was financially supported by Hansung UniversitynThe Text Retrieval Conference (TREC) is cosponsored by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), an agency of the US Commerce Department, and US Department of Defense. TREC consists of several tracks including the QA track. For each TREC QA track, NIST provides a test set of questions. Participants run their own retrieval systems on the data and return to NIST a list of the retrieved top-ranked answers. The QA track is designed to take a step closer to information retrieval rather than document retrieval. The TREC QA track question sets consist of short factual or definitional questions. Related discussions are presented at later sections of this papernPiritta Numminen, Pertti Vakkari, “Question Types in Public Libraries’ Digital Reference Service in Finland: Comparing 1999 and 2006,”

Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology

, no. 6 (2009): 1249–57; Sandra L. De Groote, “Questions Asked at the Virtual and Physical Health Sciences Reference Desk: How Do They Compare and What Do They Tell Us?”

Medical Reference Services Quarterly

, no. 2 (Summer 2005): 11–23nTaylor Robert S, '“Questions-Negotiation and Information Seeking in Libraries,”' College & Research Libraries

29

(1968): 178-94nPeter Ingwersen, “Search Procedures in the Library—Analyzed for the Cognitive Point of View,”

Journal of Documentation

, no. 3 (1982): 165–91; Norman D. Stevens, “The Importance of the Verb in the Reference Questions,”

Reference Librarian

(1988): 241–44.nStevens, “The Importance of the Verb in Reference Questions,” 243nD. Nuel, Belnap Steel Thomas B.

The Logic of Questions and Answers

(London: Yale University Press, 1976); Arthur C. Graesser and John B. Black,

The Psychology of Questions

(Hilldale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, 1985); David Harrah,

Communication

:

A Logical Model

(Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1963); Nicholas Rescher,

Empirical Inquiry

(Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield, 1982).nBelnap and Steel,

The Logic of Questions and Answers

; Harrah,

Communication

; Graesser and Black,

The Psychology of QuestionsnCaroline Heiber,

An Analysis of Questions and Answers in Libraries

(Lehigh University, 1966); Mary Seng, “Reference Service Upgraded, Using Patron’s Reference Questions,”

Special Libraries

, no. 1 (1978): 21–28; Richard L. Derr, “Questions: Definitions, Structure, and Classification,”

RQ 24

, no. 2 (Winter 1984): 186–90; Diane M. Brown, “Telephone Reference Questions: A Characterization by Subject, Answer Format, and Level of Complexity,” RQ 24, no. 3 (Spring 1985): 290–303; Barbara M. Robinson, “Reference Services: A Model of Question Handling,” RQ 29, no. 1 (Fall 1989): 48–61; Rosanne M. Cordell and Linda Fisher, “Reference Questions as an Authentic Assessment of Information Literacy,”

Reference Services Review

, no. 3(2010): 474–81nMary-Carol Lindbloom et al., “Virtual Reference: A Reference Question Is a Reference Question Or Is Virtual Reference a New Reality? New Career Opportunities for Librarians,”

Reference Librarian

, no. 93 (2006): 3–22; Julie Arendt and Stephanie Graves, “Virtual Question Changes: Reference in Evolving Environments,”

Reference Services Review

, no. 2(2011): 187–205; Matthew R. Marsteller and Danianne Mizzy, “Exploring the Synchronous Digital Reference Interaction for Query Types, Question Negotiation, and Patron Response,”

Internet Reference Services Quarterly

, no. 1/2 (2003): 149–66; De Groote, “Questions Asked,” 11; Joseph Fennewald, “Same Questions, Different Venue: An Analysis of In-Person and Online Questions,”

Reference Librarian

, no. 95/96 (2006): 20–35; Marie L. Radford et al., “‘Are We Getting Warmer?’ Query Clarification in Live Chat Virtual Reference,”

Reference & User Services Quarterly

, no. 3 (2011): 259–79nRebecca Green, '“The Role of Relational Structures in Indexing for the Humanities,”

Knowledge Organization

, no' 2 (1997): 72-83nYang-woo Kim, '“Interactive Information Retrieval Models: Tradition and Development,”

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management

, no' 2 (2007): 45-69nM. Ellen, Dawn M Voorhees Tice, '“The TREC-8 Question Answering Track Evaluation,”' Proceedings of TREC 8 (2000): accessed April 2, 2013, http://trec.nist.gov/pubs/trec8/t8_proceedings.htmlnnn () The lists of questions from TREC 8 and TREC 9 are available at nM. O’Donnell, Mohsen Ghadessy Ed., “Context in Dynamic Modeling,” in

Text and Context in Functional Linguistics

(Philadelphia: John Benjamins: Publishing Company 1999): 63-99nnOle R. Holsti, Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley 1969)nKlaus Krippendorff, Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its methodology (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage 1980)nTaylor, “Questions-Negotiation and Information Seeking in Libraries,” 185nJeffrey Pomerantz, “A Conceptual Framework and Open Research Questions for Chat-Based Reference Service,”

Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology

, no. 12 (2005): 1288–1302nNahyun Kwon, '“Public Library Patrons’ Use of Collaborative Chat Reference Service: The Effectiveness of Question Answering by Question Type,”

Library & Information Science Research

, no' 1 (2007): 70-91n