Playing Games to Improve the Quality of the Sources Students Cite in their Papers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5860/rusq.52n2.123Abstract
This study seeks to determine the effectiveness of the BiblioBouts information literacy game for improving the quality of the sources undergraduate students cite in their written papers. BiblioBouts was incorporated into a second-year English class of 45 students in which about half played the game from start to finish (i.e., players) and the other half failed to play all or part of the game (i.e., nonplayers). The authors hypothesized that the quality of the sources players cited in their papers would improve as a result of playing BiblioBouts and players would cite more scholarly sources in their final-paper bibliographies than nonplayers. About 90 percent of the sources players’ cited in their in-game bibliographies were scholarly sources. When players transitioned to their final papers, the percentage of scholarly sources they cited in their final papers dropped in half (44.6 percent); however, it surpassed the percentage (35.2 percent) of scholarly sources nonplayers cited in their final papers. The authors suggest that players put scholarly sources into play and cited them in their in-game bibliographies knowing that they would earn high scores for their actions. The authors also raise the question of whether the second-year students in this class and whether underclassmen generally understand scholarly sources well enough to integrate them into their papers. BiblioBouts players benefited in several other ways including being exposed to many more sources than they would have found on their own, becoming familiar with the library portal and its many available databases, and mastering citation management software for saving online sources’ citations and full-texts.
References
Karl V. Fast and D. Grant Campbell, “‘I Still Like Google’: University Student Perceptions of Searching OPACs and the Web, in
Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting 2004
(Medford, NJ: Information Today, 2004), 138–46; Alison J. Head, “How Do Students Conduct Academic Research?”
First Monday
, no. 8(2007), accessed February 10, 2012, http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue12_8/head/index.htmlnSteven Johnson,
Everything Bad is Good for You: How Today’s Culture is Actually Making Us Smarter
(New York: Riverhead, 2006); James Paul Gee,
What Video Games Have to Teach Us about Learning and Literacy
(New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007); Marc Prensky,
Digital Game-based Learning
(St. Paul, Minn.: Paragon House, 2007).nJohn D Shank, Steven Bell, '“Blended Librarianship: [Re]Envisioning the Role of Librarian as Educator in the Digital Information Age, ”' Reference & User Services Quarterly 51 no. 2 (Dec. 2011): 105.nBell Steven J, John Shank, '“The Blended Librarian: A Blueprint for Redefining the Teaching and Learning Role of Academic Librarians, ”' College & Research Libraries News 65 no. 7 (July 6, 2004): 373.nShank and Bell, “Blended Librarianship, ” 106.n'“Information Competency Standards for Higher Education, ”' (2001): accessed October 17, 2012, www.ala.org/acrl/standards/informationliteracycompetencynRebecca Jackson, '“Information Literacy and Its Relationship to Cognitive Development and Reflective Judgment, ”' New Directions for Teaching and Learning no. 114 (2008): 48.nJohnson, 'Everything Bad is Good for You, 41; Prensky' Digital Game-Based Learning (): 106nGee, What Video Games Have to Teach Us, 207–12.nNicola Whitton, Learning with Digital Games: A Practical Guide to Engaging Students in Higher Education (New York: Routledge 2010) 52.nKurt Squire,
Video Games and Learning: Teaching and Participatory Culture in the Digital Age
(New York: Teachers College Press, 2011): 219; Justine Martin and Robin Ewing, “Power up! Using Digital Gaming Techniques to Enhance Library Instruction, ”
Internet Reference Services Quarterly
, no. 2/3 (2008): 223.nIbid., 213.nJohn Kirriemuir, Peter Godwin Ed., '“Teaching Information Literacy through Digital Games, ”' Information Literacy Meets Library 2.0. (London: Facet 2008)nAndrew Walsh, '“Information Literacy Assessment: Where Do We Start?”' Journal of Librarianship & Information Science 41 no. 1 (2009): 19-28n(): Thomas Kirk “A Comparison of Two Methods of Library Instruction for Students in Introductory Biology, ”
College & Research Libraries
no. 6 (1971): 465–74; Amy Dykeman and Barbara King, “Term Paper Analysis: A Proposal for Evaluating Bibliographic Instruction, ”
Research Strategies
, no. 1 (1983)14–21; Bonnie Gratch, “Toward a Methodology for Evaluating Research Paper Bibliographies, ”
Research Strategies
, no. 4 (1985): 170–177; David F. Kohl and Lizbeth A. Wilson, “Effectiveness of Course-integrated Bibliographic Instruction in Improving Coursework, ”
RQ
, no. 2 (1986): 206–11; V. E. Young and L. G. Ackerson, “Evaluation of Student Research Paper Bibliographies: Refining Evaluation Criteria, ”
Research Strategies
, no. 2 (1995): 80–93.nKirk, “A Comparison of Two Methods, ” 470.nDykeman and King, “Term Paper Analysis, ” 16.n(): Philip M. Davis and Suzanne A. Cohen, “The Effect of the Web on Undergraduate Citation Behavior 1996–1999, ”
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
, no. 4 (2001) 309–14; Penny Beile, David N. Boote, and Elizabeth Killingsworth, “Characteristics of Educational Doctoral Dissertation References: An Inter-institutional Analysis of Review of Literature Citations, (paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, Ill., 2003), http://eprints.rclis.org/handle/10760/15870#.TzWV7yNaNV4nLong and Shrikhande, “Improving Information-Seeking Behavior, ” 361.nTuñón and Brydges, “A Study on Using Rubrics, ” 467.nMiddleton, “An Attempt to Quantify, ” 13.nIbid.nKevin Crowston, Barbara H. Kwasnik, '“A Framework for Creating a Faceted Classification for Genres: Addressing Issues of Multidimensionality”' (Kona, Hawaii: paper presented at the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2004) doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2004.1265268.nChris Leeder, Karen Markey, Elizabeth Yakel, '“A Faceted Taxonomy for Rating Student Bibliographies in an Online Information Literacy Game, ”' College & Research Libraries 73 no. 2 (March 2012): 115-33nIbid., 121.nIbid., 122.nJackson, “Information Literacy, ” 60.n
