Comparison of Traditional and Digital Reference Questions and Responses at the National Library and Archives of I.R. of Iran (NLAI)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5860/rusq.52n2.136Abstract
The researchers seek to assess the characteristics of users of reference services and their information needs to know how to qualitatively and quantitatively improve these types of services at the NLAI. Findings of this study indicated that the most frequently asked questions at the reference desks of the NLAI were ready reference questions (33.55 percent) and the least common questions were research-based (17.34 percent). Females (65.53 percent) mostly used traditional reference service but males (54.55 percent) used virtual reference service more. Also analysis showed that the most common and the least common question types at the traditional reference desk were ready reference (42.42 percent) and research questions (6.89 percent) respectively; and those asked through virtual reference were research (32.28 percent) and directory (20.08 percent) questions respectively. Most of the questions asked by clients of both traditional and virtual reference services could be classified in computer science, information, and general works (000) (30.58 percent) while the fewest questions were clustered in philosophy and psychology (100) (1.18 percent).
References
N. Calabretta and R. Ross, “Analysis of Reference Transactions Using Packaged Computer Programs, ”
Medical Reference Services Quarterly
(Fall 1984): 23–47.nT. K. Landworth, M. L. Wilson, and J. L. Dorsch, “Reference Activity and the External User: Confluence of Community Needs at a Medical School Branch Library, ”
Bulletin of the Medical Library Association
(1998): 205–12.nMarzieh Hedayat, “Evalution of Reference Queries in College Libraries of Ahvaz Shahid Chamran University in 1993–1994” (MS diss., Tehran University, 1994).nW. Sullivan, L. A Schoppmann, and P. M. Redman, “Analysis of the Use of Reference Services in an Academic Health Sciences Library, ”
Medical Reference Services Quarterly
(1994): 35–55.nD. G. Warner, “A New Classification for Reference Statistics, ”
Reference & User Services Quarterly
(2001): 51–53.nW. Diamond, B. G. Pease, “Digital Reference: A Case Study of Question Types in an Academic Library, ”
Reference Services Review
(2001): 210–19.nS. Ware et al., “Ask a Penn State Librarian, Live: Virtual Reference Service at Penn State, ”
Reference Librarian
/80 (2002–3): 281–95.nM. Broughton Kelly, “Usage and User Analysis of a Real-Time Digital Reference Services, ”
Reference Librarian
(2002): 183–200.nSherry Engle Moeller, “Ask-A-Librarian: An analysis of an E-mail Reference Service at a Large Academic Library, ”
Internet Reference Services Quarterly
(2003): 47–61, accessed November 10, 2011, www.mendeley.com/research/askalibrarian-an-analysis-of-an-email-reference-service-at-a-large-academic-librarynSandra L. De Groote, “Questions Asked at the Virtual and Physical Health Science Reference Desk: How Do They Compare and What Do They Tell Us?, ”
Medical Reference Service Quarterly
(2005), accessed November 10, 2011, www.mendeley.com/research/questions-asked-virtual-physical-health-sciences-reference-desk-compare-tellnV. Houlson, K. McCready, and C. S. Phfal, “A Window into Our Patron’s Needs: Analyzing Data from Chat Transcripts, ”
Internet Reference Services Quarterly
(2006): 19–39.nD. B. Henry and T. M. Neville, “Testing Classification Systems for Reference Questions, ”
Reference & User Services Quarterly
(2008): 364–73.nHarry C. Meserve et al., “Developing a Model for Reference Research Statistics—Applying the ‘Warner Model’ of Reference Question Classification to Streamline Research Services, ”
Reference & User Services Quarterly
(2009): 247–58.nMorais Yasmin and Sampson Sara, “A Content Analysis of Chat Transcripts in the Georgetown Law Library, ”, 29: (2010): 165–78.nFarnaz Mohammadi, “Qualitative Evaluation of Virtual Reference Service of National Archive and Library of Iran and Suggesting an Appropriate Pattern” (MS diss., Islamic Azad University, North Tehran Branch, 2011).nWarner, “A New Classification for Reference Statistics, ” 53.nWilliam Katz,
Introduction to Reference Work
, 8th ed. (Boston: McGraw-Hill, 2002), 16–18.nRajanews, “Increasing Number of Students of Humanities in Recent 10 Years, ” accessed November 10, 2011, http://rajanews.com/Detail.asp?id=128484n
